Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Barack Obama. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Barack Obama. Mostrar todas las entradas

domingo, 2 de octubre de 2011

Cincuenta por ciento más uno



Por Kenneth D. McClintock Hernández

 El Presidente Barack Obama expresó esta semana que una mayoría absoluta mínima de cincuenta por ciento más un voto del electorado puertorriqueño podría no ser suficiente para aprobar un cambio en la relación política con Puerto Rico. Como es de esperarse, sus expresiones, no producto de un discurso escrito detalladamente elaborado, sino de una contestación impromptu en un período libre de preguntas y respuestas, han levantado un avispero, quizás mayor de lo que él pudiera haberse imaginado.

 En el día de ayer ofrecí la siguiente reacción escrita a un medio que me preguntó sobre esas expresiones del Presidente, las cuales entiendo pero no necesariamente comparto en todos sus detalles:

 "Hay estados, como Nebraska, en que una mera pluralidad fue suficiente para ser admitido y otros, como West Virginia, en que ni tan siquiera se pidió la admisión. Personalmente creo que una mayoría en contra del status quo o a favor de una fórmula de cambio será suficiente, no para cambiar de inmediato nuestra relación presente pero sí para iniciar el proceso de negociación legislativa que conduzca a esa descolonización. 

 A Illinois le tomó solo once meses, pero a Nuevo México 65 años obtener la admisión una vez solicitada, por lo que el proceso no necesariamente será rápido. 

 Mi exhortación a los que, como yo, quieren librar a Puerto Rico de los enormes costos del coloniaje y ser admitido como estado federado de nuestra nación, es que emprendamos la tarea de ganar ambas preguntas de la papeleta plebiscitaria por el mayor margen posible de manera que el nuevo Congreso en el 2013 tenga que enfrentarse a un nuevo paradigma de status de un pueblo que contundentemente le haya retirado a los Estados Unidos cualquier reclamo de "consentimiento de los gobernados" que legitime la relación territorial/colonial actual y una petición mayoritaria para iniciar la negociación de una Ley de Admisión que no cobre vigencia hasta ser ratificada por el pueblo. 

 Como ha dicho el gobernador Luis Fortuño al discrepar de las palabras de Obama, hay 37 ejemplos de que todo territorio que quería entrar a la Unión lo logró, no importa cuan grande o pequeña fuera la mayoría inicial que dio inicio al proceso de admisión---y Luis Fortuño ha estudiado mucho más los procesos de admisión que Barack Obama. 

 No dejemos que la opinión del actual Presidente, o cualquiera de sus potenciales contrincantes, nos divida o nos provea una excusa para la inacción, sino que nos inspire a la acción plebiscitaria que torne el escenario que él plantea irrelevante. A un año o menos de una consulta plebiscitaria, ¡construyamos, no con excusas sino con educación y trabajo ideológico, esas mayorías contundentes, en contra del status quo, y a favor de la Estadidad Federada, que obliguen a la Presidencia y al Congreso a actuar a partir del 2013!"

 A medida que se caliente la campaña electoral presidencial, gubernatorial y plebiscitaria del 2012, los líderes pepedés ( a quienes les aterra la posibilidad de que los electores puertorriqueños se expresen directamente sobre su futuro) tratarán de agarrarse hasta de un clavo caliente, sean con expresiones como la del Presidente, posturas de sus potenciales contrincantes republicanos, palabras de un congresista, un senador, un libro o un informe congresional, para lograr uno o varios objetivos. Entre estos, tratar de dividir a los Estadistas, desanimar a los Estadistas, restarle credibilidad a los Estadistas, o varias o todas las anteriores.

 La realidad es que en apenas un año o menos, los Estadistas tenemos la oportunidad de relegar a la irrelevancia el escenario plebiscitario que plantea el Presidente Obama---que una fórmula de status gane con una mayoría absoluta mínima de poco más del 50% de los votos. Un resultado sólido a favor del cambio, en contra de la relación actual, en la primera pregunta de la papeleta plebiscitaria le negaría a los Estados Unidos la cómoda postura de reclamar que la mayoría de los gobernados ha consentido a la relación actual, postura que ha justificado su inacción en el Congreso (no así en las Casa Blancas de Bush, Clinton, Bush y Obama) y en las Naciones Unidas. De igual forma, un apoyo mayoritario por encima del 50 por ciento a la Estadidad Federada podrá no ser suficiente para que se nos conceda automáticamente, pero sería suficiene para obligar al Gobierno Federal a iniciar el proceso de negociar una Ley Habilitadora que, una vez ratificada por el pueblo de Puerto Rico de la manera que el Congreso disponga, conduzca a nuestra admisión.

 Sin embargo, para que ese escenario se dé, tenemos que aprovechar cada día, cada hora, cada minuto libre que dispongamos para educar, aclarar dudas, motivar a los puertorriqueños que han visto la Estadidad como una opción a largo plazo que lo largo se hizo corto y que el momento es ya, para construir una mayoría contundente, en la primera pregunta de la papeleta a favor del cambio y en contra del status quo, y en la segunda pregunta a favor de la Estadidad.

 Como Adán y Eva, los estadistas tenemos que evadir las tentaciones que como manzana en el paraíso nos ofrecen los líderes pepedés...la tentación de no hacer campaña ideológica hasta tanto se apruebe un proyecto plebiscitario... la tentación de dejar que los líderes pepedés nos motiven a la inacción por lo que diga a deje de decir Obama, o Perry, o Romney, o Christie, o Palin... la tentación de echar a un lado la educación ideológica para enfocarnos exclusivamente en las peleas primaristas... o la tentación de dejar que nuestras funciones oficiales de gobierno monopolicen todo el tiempo libre que deberíamos dedicar a asuntos plebiscitarios.

 Obama expresa una opinión, con la que no necesariamente todos estemos de acuerdo y que otros, como papagallos repiten, sobre un escenario específico en que una opción plebiscitaria gane por apenas el 50%. Elevemos ese resultado lo más alto por encima del 50% (como logró Pierluisi crear una supermayoría en la Cámara a favor del HR2499) con nuestro esfuerzo unido de campaña plebiscitaria y haremos innecesario experimentar si tenía o no razón el Presidente.

 Me recuerda Phillip Arroyo, mi experto en asuntos congresionales y federales en la oficina y presidente del capítulo boricua de Young Democrats of America que, al considerarse el proyecto Pierluisi en la Comisión de Recursos, el congresista republicano Jason Chaffetz propuso una enmienda para requerir más del 50% más uno de mayoría para que una opción prevaleciera y fue derrotada ampliamente en comisión.

martes, 23 de agosto de 2011

President Obama Signs Puerto Rico Emergency Declaration

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
August 22, 2011

President Obama Signs Puerto Rico Emergency Declaration

The President today declared an emergency exists in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and ordered federal aid to supplement commonwealth and local response efforts in the area struck by Hurricane Irene beginning on August 21, 2011, and continuing.

The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, and to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in all 78 municipalities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

Specifically, FEMA is authorized to identify, mobilize, and provide at its discretion, equipment and resources necessary to alleviate the impacts of the emergency. Emergency protective measures, limited to direct federal assistance, will be provided at 75 percent federal funding.

W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, named Justo Hernández as the Federal Coordinating Officer for federal recovery operations in the affected area.

domingo, 31 de julio de 2011

President announces Debt-Limit Deal

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
July 31, 2011

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
8:40 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good evening. There are still some very important votes to be taken by members of Congress, but I want to announce that the leaders of both parties, in both chambers, have reached an agreement that will reduce the deficit and avoid default -- a default that would have had a devastating effect on our economy.

The first part of this agreement will cut about $1 trillion in spending over the next 10 years -- cuts that both parties had agreed to early on in this process. The result would be the lowest level of annual domestic spending since Dwight Eisenhower was President -- but at a level that still allows us to make job-creating investments in things like education and research. We also made sure that these cuts wouldn’t happen so abruptly that they’d be a drag on a fragile economy.

Now, I've said from the beginning that the ultimate solution to our deficit problem must be balanced. Despite what some Republicans have argued, I believe that we have to ask the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share by giving up tax breaks and special deductions. Despite what some in my own party have argued, I believe that we need to make some modest adjustments to programs like Medicare to ensure that they’re still around for future generations.

That's why the second part of this agreement is so important. It establishes a bipartisan committee of Congress to report back by November with a proposal to further reduce the deficit, which will then be put before the entire Congress for an up or down vote. In this stage, everything will be on the table. To hold us all accountable for making these reforms, tough cuts that both parties would find objectionable would automatically go into effect if we don’t act. And over the next few months, I’ll continue to make a detailed case to these lawmakers about why I believe a balanced approach is necessary to finish the job.

Now, is this the deal I would have preferred? No. I believe that we could have made the tough choices required -- on entitlement reform and tax reform -- right now, rather than through a special congressional committee process. But this compromise does make a serious down payment on the deficit reduction we need, and gives each party a strong incentive to get a balanced plan done before the end of the year.

Most importantly, it will allow us to avoid default and end the crisis that Washington imposed on the rest of America. It ensures also that we will not face this same kind of crisis again in six months, or eight months, or 12 months. And it will begin to lift the cloud of debt and the cloud of uncertainty that hangs over our economy.

Now, this process has been messy; it’s taken far too long. I've been concerned about the impact that it has had on business confidence and consumer confidence and the economy as a whole over the last month. Nevertheless, ultimately, the leaders of both parties have found their way toward compromise. And I want to thank them for that.

Most of all, I want to thank the American people. It’s been your voices -- your letters, your emails, your tweets, your phone calls -- that have compelled Washington to act in the final days. And the American people's voice is a very, very powerful thing.

We’re not done yet. I want to urge members of both parties to do the right thing and support this deal with your votes over the next few days. It will allow us to avoid default. It will allow us to pay our bills. It will allow us to start reducing our deficit in a responsible way. And it will allow us to turn to the very important business of doing everything we can to create jobs, boost wages, and grow this economy faster than it's currently growing.

That’s what the American people sent us here to do, and that’s what we should be devoting all of our time to accomplishing in the months ahead.

Thank you very much, everybody.

END 8:44 P.M. EDT

jueves, 7 de julio de 2011

Rossello v. United States and the Right to Vote for Puerto Rico

By Jo McKeegan / Published July 5, 2011

During a week in which we celebrate the American colonies for seeking independence in large part due to denial of representation in the British parliament, it’s time for us to have a candid conversation about voting rights in our own present day “colonies”, starting with the American territory of Puerto Rico.

Brought in the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights by former governor of Puerto Rico Pedro Rossello, Rossello v. United States addresses the lack of a right to cast a ballot and have such ballots counted in national elections for president and Congress by residents of Puerto Rico. Petitioner Rossello has been disenfranchised, along with all other residents of Puerto Rico, despite his American citizenship, based solely on his area of residence within the United States. Currently, any American moving their residence to Puerto Rico would similarly be disenfranchised. This glaring discrimination against United States citizens living in Puerto Rico cannot be allowed to continue under international law and FairVote fully supports Rossello in his efforts.

The United States government is improperly denying the ability to vote to at least 3.7 million of its citizens in stating that the Resident Commission non-voting member of Congress is sufficient to address Puerto Rico’s needs. It is simply not reasonable to believe that one non-voting representative to Congress is equivalent to two senators, approximately six members of the House of Representatives, and a vote for the president and a vice president. The residents of Puerto Rico are being systematically disenfranchised and relegated to second class citizenship by their own government.

Puerto Rico’s current disenfranchised status is not acceptable. Unemployment in Puerto Rico is over 16% - grotesquely high even in an area where unemployment is always higher than that of the mainland. Residents of Puerto Rico pay the same social security and Medicaid taxes as mainlanders; however, they generally receive about 93% less in Medicaid coverage, something many believe is due to Puerto Rico’s inability to lobby for itself in Congress. Puerto Rico is hemorrhaging over 35,000 people a year and those who do leave are usually the highest educated, highly skilled, young, and Republican. In short, not having a voice at the national level is having a real effect on four million American lives.

Failing to provide basic suffrage rights to Puerto Rico is particularly ironic in a time of way when Puerto Rican Americans serve in our armed services at higher rates than most of our states. Petitioner claims that no other area of the United States suffered so many casualties of war prior to becoming a state as Puerto Rico has, or had more decorated and high ranking service members. Puerto Rican soldiers can be ordered into battle by a Commander in Chief for whom they have no power to vote.


And yet all evidence demonstrates that Puerto Ricans greatly value suffrage rights. Voter turnout in election for governor of Puerto Rico are higher than the gubernatorial election of any governor in the United States. In fact, 81% of the 2.4 million registered voters went to the polls in 2004, and Puerto Ricans make Election Day a holiday for their elections.

Voting rights in other American "colonies" differ. The phrase “the Constitution does not follow the flag” is often tossed around during this conversation to justify the varying levels of right in territories held by the United States. Additionally, “territory” is a broad term. For example, Americans living in American Samoa are U.S. nationals, but not U.S. citizens. The U.S. Virgin Islands require American citizens from the mainland to go through customs. Guam’s constitutional has never been approved by the Unites States Congress. People with residence in any territory, including Guam, the Virgin Islands, the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa all have no right to vote for national representatives, in the form of a voting member of Congress or a elector vote for the U.S. President.

The political leaders of an American territory should not have to sue their own country in an international court in order to be heard as full citizens. But the series of cases controlling Puerto Rico’s status are racist (written by the same court as Plessy v. Ferguson) and a national embarrassment. Under the current system, without a right to vote in the national government, the discrimination against American citizens living in its colonies/territories will continue. For that reason, FairVote supports the efforts of Rossello on behalf the 3.7 million disenfranchised Puerto Ricans in his attempt to gain the voting right he is due as an American citizen.

President Obama’s recent visit to Puerto Rico was the first such state visit since one by President John Kennedy, and even that first-in-a-half-century visit was seen by many analysts as primarily a means to raise campaign funds and appeal to Puerto Ricans living in the continental United States. The president's pledge to support the will of Puerto Ricans should they vote on statehood again ("When the people of Puerto Rico make a clear decision, my administration will stand by you.") is welcome—but no substitute for immediately seeking means to address the broader problem of how we treat American citizens living in Puerto Rico.

miércoles, 22 de junio de 2011

On the Way Forward in Afghanistan

22 de junio, 2011

Declaraciones del Presidente Barack Obama
Sobre el camino por delante en Afganistán
Washington, D.C.
22 de junio, 2011

Buenas noches. Hace casi 10 años, Estados Unidos fue víctima del peor ataque contra nuestras costas desde Pearl Harbor. Este asesinato en masa lo planearon Osama bin Laden y su red de Al Qaida en Afganistán, y representó una nueva amenaza para nuestra seguridad, donde los objetivos ya no eran soldados en el campo de batalla, sino hombres, mujeres y niños inocentes que realizaban sus actividades cotidianas.

En los días posteriores, nuestra nación se unió en torno a la ofensiva que llevamos a cabo en contra de Al Qaida y a medida que derrotamos al Talibán en Afganistán. Luego cambiamos de objetivo. Se inició una segunda guerra en Irak, y derramamos muchísima sangre y gastamos mucho dinero para respaldar al nuevo gobierno allí. Cuando yo asumí el mando, la guerra en Afganistán se encontraba en su séptimo año. Pero los líderes de Al Qaida habían escapado a Pakistán y planeaban ataques nuevos, y mientras tanto, el Talibán se había reagrupado y tomado la ofensiva. Sin una nueva estrategia ni medidas decisivas, nuestros comandantes militares advirtieron que era posible que enfrentáramos el resurgimiento de Al Qaida y el retorno al poder por el Talibán en Afganistán.

Por este motivo, en una de las decisiones más difíciles que he tomado como Presidente, ordené la movilización de 30,000 soldados estadounidenses adicionales a Afganistán. Cuando anuncié este aumento de tropas enWest Point, fijamos objetivos claros: enfocarnos nuevamente en Al Qaida; revertir el ímpetu del Talibán, y capacitar a las fuerzas de seguridad de Afganistán para defender a su propio país. También dejé en claro que nuestro compromiso no era ilimitado y que nuestras tropas comenzarían a regresar a casa en julio de este año.

Esta noche, les puedo decir que hemos cumplido esa promesa. Gracias a nuestros hombres y mujeres de uniforme, nuestro personal civil y los muchos socios de nuestra coalición, hemos cumplido nuestros objetivos. Como resultado, a partir del mes entrante y hasta fines de este año, podremos retirar 10,000 de nuestros soldados de Afganistán, y para el próximo verano, un total de 33,000 soldados podrán haber emprendido el retorno a casa, revirtiendo así del todo el aumento de tropas que anuncié en West Point. Tras esta reducción inicial, nuestros soldados continuarán regresando a casa a paso firme a medida que las fuerzas de seguridad de Afganistán asuman la delantera. Nuestra misión de combate pasará a ser de apoyo. Para el 2014, se concluirá este proceso de transición y el pueblo afgano estará a cargo de su propia seguridad.

Estamos iniciando esta reducción desde una posición de fuerza. Al Qaida está bajo más presión que nunca desde el 11 de septiembre. Junto con los paquistaníes, hemos eliminado a más de la mitad de los líderes de Al Qaida. Y gracias a nuestros profesionales de inteligencia y Fuerzas Especiales, eliminamos a Osama bin Laden, el único líder que Al Qaida conoció jamás. Esta fue una victoria para todos aquellos que han prestado servicios desde el 11 de septiembre. Un soldado lo resumió muy bien. “El mensaje”, dijo, “es que no olvidamos. Haremos que rindan cuentas, sin importar el tiempo que tome”.

La información que recuperamos del complejo de bin Laden indica que Al Qaida enfrenta serias dificultades. Bin Laden expresó inquietud de que Al Qaida no hubiera logrado reemplazar a los terroristas de alta jerarquía que habían sido eliminados y de que Al Qaida hubiera fracasado en su esfuerzo por caracterizar a Estados Unidos como un país en guerra contra el islam, privándola así de respaldo más generalizado. Al Qaida sigue siendo peligroso, y debemos permanecer alerta a ataques. Pero hemos puesto a Al Qaida en el camino a la derrota, y no cejaremos hasta que se concluya la labor.

En Afganistán, hemos causado bajas importantes en el Talibán y hemos tomado varios de sus baluartes. Además de nuestro aumento de tropas, nuestros aliados también han incrementado su compromiso, lo que ha ayudado a darle más estabilidad al país. Las Fuerzas de Seguridad de Afganistán cuentan ahora con más de 100,000 efectivos adicionales, y en algunas provincias y municipalidades, hemos comenzado a entregarle alpueblo afgano la responsabilidad por la seguridad. Ante la violencia e intimidación, los afganos están luchando y muriendo por su país, creando fuerzas policiales locales, abriendo mercados y escuelas, creando oportunidades para las mujeres y niñas, y tratando de pasar la página tras varias décadas de guerra.

Por supuesto que todavía existen enormes desafíos. Esto es solo el inicio –pero no el final– de nuestro esfuerzo por llevar esta guerra a su fin. Debemos realizar la difícil labor de retener los logros que hemos alcanzado a la vez que reducimos nuestras fuerzas y le entregamos al pueblo afgano la responsabilidad por la seguridad. Y en mayo, en Chicago, realizaremos una cumbre con nuestros aliados y socios de la OTAN para definir la próxima fase de esta transición.

Lo que sí sabemos es que sin un acuerdo político no puede haber paz en un territorio que ha visto tantas guerras. Por lo tanto, a la vez que reforzamos las Fuerzas de Seguridad del gobierno afgano, Estados Unidos se sumará a campañas por la reconciliación del pueblo afgano, en las que se incluirá al Talibán. Nuestra posición sobre estas conversaciones es clara: las debe dirigir el gobierno afgano, y quienes quieren ser parte de un Afganistán pacífico deben romper con Al Qaida, abandonar la violencia y respetar la constitución de Afganistán. Pero debido en parte a nuestro esfuerzo militar, tenemos motivo para creer que se pueden alcanzar logros.

El objetivo que tenemos se puede alcanzar y se puede expresar de manera simple: no habrá refugio desde el cual Al Qaida o sus afiliados puedan lanzar ataques contra nuestro territorio o nuestros aliados. No trataremos de hacer que Afganistán sea un lugar perfecto. No patrullaremos sus calles ni montañas indefinidamente. Esa es la responsabilidad del gobierno afgano, que debe aumentar su capacidad de proteger a su gente y pasar de una economía moldeada por la guerra a una que pueda sustentar una paz perdurable. Lo que podemos hacer y haremos será forjar una sólida alianza con el pueblo afgano que asegure que podamos seguir yendo en pos de los terroristas y apoyando al gobierno soberano de Afganistán.

Por supuesto que nuestros esfuerzos también deben lidiar con los refugios terroristas en Pakistán. No hay país más afectado por la presencia de extremistas violentos, motivo por el cual continuaremos presionando a Pakistán para que aumente su participación en afianzar un futuro más pacífico para esta región desgarrada por la guerra. Colaboraremos con el gobierno de Pakistán para arrancar de raíz el cáncer del extremismo violento e insistiremos en que cumpla sus promesas. Que no quepa la menor duda de que mientras sea Presidente, Estados Unidos nunca tolerará un refugio para quienes se proponen matarnos: no podrán eludirnos ni evitar ser llevados ante la justicia como lo merecen.

Conciudadanos: esta ha sido una década difícil para nuestro país. Las lecciones aprendidas no son nuevas: el gran costo de la guerra –costo pagado por casi 4,500 estadounidenses que perdieron la vida en Irak y más de 1,500 en Afganistán–, hombres y mujeres que no podrán gozar de la libertad que defendieron. Miles más fueron heridos. Algunos han perdido extremidades en el campo de batalla y otros aún luchan contra los demonios que los siguieron a casa.

Sin embargo, esta noche, nos reconforta saber que las sombras de la guerra se están alejando. Menos de nuestros hijos e hijas luchan en lugares peligrosos. Hemos concluido nuestra misión de combate en Irak y 100,000 soldados estadounidenses ya han salido de ese país. Y a pesar de que todavía habrá días funestos en Afganistán, se puede ver la luz de una paz segura a la distancia. Estas largas guerras llegarán de manera responsable a su fin.

Mientras esto sucede debemos aprender sus lecciones. Esta década de guerra ya ha causado que muchos hagan preguntas sobre el carácter de la participación por Estados Unidos en el mundo. Hay quienes quisieran que Estados Unidos deje de cumplir con su responsabilidad como piedra angular de la seguridad mundial y adopte un aislamiento que haga caso omiso de las amenazas muy reales que enfrentamos. Otros quisieran que Estados Unidos abarque demasiado y que enfrente cada mal que se puede encontrar en el extranjero.

Debemos trazar un curso más centrado. Como las generaciones previas, debemos aceptar la función singular de Estados Unidos en el curso de la historia de la humanidad. Pero nuestras pasiones deben ir de la mano de nuestro pragmatismo; y nuestra determinación de la mano de la estrategia. Cuando nos amenazan, debemos responder con fuerza, pero cuando es posible enfocar esa fuerza, no es necesario que movilicemos grandes ejércitos al extranjero. Cuando se mata a inocentes y se pone en peligro la seguridad mundial, no es necesario que decidamos entre permanecer cruzados de brazos o actuar solos. Más bien, debemos promover la acción internacional, lo que estamos haciendo en Libia, donde no tenemos a ningún soldado en el terreno, pero estamos apoyando a aliados para proteger al pueblo libio y darle la oportunidad de determinar su destino.

Con todo lo que hacemos, debemos recordar que lo que distingue a Estados Unidos no es solamente nuestro poderío, sino los principios de la fundación de nuestro país. Somos una nación que lleva a sus enemigos ante la justicia mientras se rige por el imperio de la ley y respeta los derechos de todos nuestros ciudadanos. Protegemos nuestra propia libertad y prosperidad al extendérselas a otros. No representamos el imperialismo sino la autodeterminación. Por eso tenemos un interés en las aspiraciones democráticas que está surgiendo en todo el mundo árabe. Apoyaremos esas revoluciones con fidelidad a nuestros ideales, con el poder de nuestro ejemplo y con una firme convicción de que todos los seres humanos merecen vivir con libertad y dignidad.

Por encima de todo, somos una nación cuyo poderío en el extranjero ha tenido como fundamento las oportunidades de nuestros ciudadanos dentro del país. En la última década, hemos gastado un billón de dólares en la guerra, en un momento de incremento de la deuda y dificultades económicas. Ahora debemos invertir en el mayor recurso de Estados Unidos: nuestro pueblo. Debemos dar rienda suelta a la innovación que genera nuevos empleos sectores industriales a la vez que vivimos dentro de nuestras posibilidades. Debemos reconstruir nuestra infraestructura y encontrar nuevas fuentes de energía limpia. Y más que nada, tras una década de debate acalorado, debemos recuperar el propósito común que compartíamos al inicio de este período de guerra, pues nuestra nación deriva su fortaleza de nuestras diferencias, y cuando nuestra nación es fuerte, ningunacolina es demasiado empinada ni ningún horizonte está fuera de nuestro alcance.

Estados Unidos: es hora de concentrarnos en el desarrollo de nuestra nación.

En este esfuerzo, nos sirven de inspiración nuestros conciudadanos que han sacrificado tanto a favor nuestro. A nuestros soldados, nuestros veteranos y sus familias, les hablo en nombre de todos los estadounidenses cuando digo que cumpliremos nuestro compromiso sagrado con ustedes y les proporcionaremos el cuidado, los beneficios y las oportunidades que merecen.

Conocí a algunos de esos estadounidenses patrióticos en Fort Campbell. Hace un tiempo hablé ante la 101º División Aerotransportada, que ha luchado para revertir la situación en Afganistán, y al equipo que eliminó a Osama bin Laden. Parado ante una maqueta del complejo de bin Laden, el miembro de los Navy SEALS que dirigió nuestro esfuerzo rindió homenaje a los caídos: hermanos y hermanas combatientes cuyos nombres ahora están escritos en las bases desde las cuales nuestras tropas nos defienden en el extranjero y las lápidas en plácidos rincones de nuestro país donde nunca pasarán al olvido. Este oficial –como muchos otros que he conocido en las bases en Bagdad y Bagram, Walter Reed y el Hospital Naval de Bethesda–, habló con humildad de cómo su unidad actuó como un solo hombre: se apoyaron unos a otros y confiaron entre sí, como lo haría una familia en momentos peligrosos.

Vale la pena recordar que todos somos parte de la familia estadounidense. A pesar de que hemos tenido desacuerdos y divisiones, nos une la doctrina que está escrita en los documentos de nuestra fundación y la convicción de que Estados Unidos de Norteamérica es un país que puede lograr cualquier cosa que se proponga. Ahora concluyamos la labor ante nosotros. Llevemos estas guerras a su fin de manera responsable y recobremos el Sueño Americano que es el núcleo de nuestra historia. Con confianza en nuestra causa; con fe en nuestros conciudadanos y con esperanza en el corazón, dediquémonos a la labor de extender la promesa de Estados Unidos a esta generación y a la próxima. Que Dios bendiga a nuestros soldados. Y que Dios bendiga a Estados Unidos de Norteamérica.

###

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
__________________________________
June 22, 2011
Remarks of President Barack Obama
On the Way Forward in Afghanistan
Washington, D.C.
June 22, 2011

Good evening. Nearly ten years ago, America suffered the worst attack on our shores since Pearl Harbor. This mass murder was planned by Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network in Afghanistan, and signaled a new threat to our security – one in which the targets were no longer soldiers on a battlefield, but innocent men, women and children going about their daily lives.

In the days that followed, our nation was united as we struck at al Qaeda and routed the Taliban in Afghanistan. Then, our focus shifted. A second war was launched in Iraq, and we spent enormous blood and treasure to support a new government there. By the time I took office, the war in Afghanistan had entered its seventh year. But al Qaeda’s leaders had escaped into Pakistan and were plotting new attacks, while the Taliban had regrouped and gone on the offensive. Without a new strategy and decisive action, our military commanders warned that we could face a resurgent al Qaeda, and a Taliban taking over large parts of Afghanistan.

For this reason, in one of the most difficult decisions that I’ve made as President, I ordered an additional 30,000 American troops into Afghanistan. When I announced this surge at West Point, we set clear objectives: to refocus on al Qaeda; reverse the Taliban’s momentum; and train Afghan Security Forces to defend their own country. I also made it clear that our commitment would not be open-ended, and that we would begin to drawdown our forces this July.

Tonight, I can tell you that we are fulfilling that commitment. Thanks to our men and women in uniform, our civilian personnel, and our many coalition partners, we are meeting our goals. As a result, starting next month, we will be able to remove 10,000 of our troops from Afghanistan by the end of this year, and we will bring home a total of 33,000 troops by next summer, fully recovering the surge I announced at West Point. After this initial reduction, our troops will continue coming home at a steady pace as Afghan Security forces move into the lead. Our mission will change from combat to support. By 2014, this process of transition will be complete, and the Afghan people will be responsible for their own security.

We are starting this drawdown from a position of strength. Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11. Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.”

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain. Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda has been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that have been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam – thereby draining more widespread support. Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks. But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.

In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds. Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan Security Forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people. In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war.

Of course, huge challenges remain. This is the beginning – but not the end – of our effort to wind down this war. We will have to do the hard work of keeping the gains that we have made, while we drawdown our forces and transition responsibility for security to the Afghan government. And next May, in Chicago, we will host a summit with our NATO allies and partners to shape the next phase of this transition.

We do know that peace cannot come to a land that has known so much war without a political settlement. So as we strengthen the Afghan government and Security Forces, America will join initiatives that reconcile the Afghan people, including the Taliban. Our position on these talks is clear: they must be led by the Afghan government, and those who want to be a part of a peaceful Afghanistan must break from al Qaeda, abandon violence, and abide by the Afghan Constitution. But, in part because of our military effort, we have reason to believe that progress can be made.

The goal that we seek is achievable, and can be expressed simply: no safe-haven from which al Qaeda or its affiliates can launch attacks against our homeland, or our allies. We will not try to make Afghanistan a perfect place. We will not police its streets or patrol its mountains indefinitely. That is the responsibility of the Afghan government, which must step up its ability to protect its people; and move from an economy shaped by war to one that can sustain a lasting peace. What we can do, and will do, is build a partnership with the Afghan people that endures – one that ensures that we will be able to continue targeting terrorists and supporting a sovereign Afghan government.

Of course, our efforts must also address terrorist safe-havens in Pakistan. No country is more endangered by the presence of violent extremists, which is why we will continue to press Pakistan to expand its participation in securing a more peaceful future for this war-torn region. We will work with the Pakistani government to root out the cancer of violent extremism, and we will insist that it keep its commitments. For there should be no doubt that so long as I am President, the United States will never tolerate a safe-haven for those who aim to kill us: they cannot elude us, nor escape the justice they deserve.

My fellow Americans, this has been a difficult decade for our country. We have learned anew the profound cost of war -- a cost that has been paid by the nearly 4500 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq, and the over 1500 who have done so in Afghanistan – men and women who will not live to enjoy the freedom that they defended. Thousands more have been wounded. Some have lost limbs on the field of battle, and others still battle the demons that have followed them home.

Yet tonight, we take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding. Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm’s way. We have ended our combat mission in Iraq, with 100,000 American troops already out of that country. And even as there will be dark days ahead in Afghanistan, the light of a secure peace can be seen in the distance. These long wars will come to a responsible end.

As they do, we must learn their lessons. Already this decade of war has caused many to question the nature of America’s engagement around the world. Some would have America retreat from our responsibility as an anchor of global security, and embrace an isolation that ignores the very real threats that we face. Others would have America over-extend ourselves, confronting every evil that can be found abroad.

We must chart a more centered course. Like generations before, we must embrace America’s singular role in the course of human events. But we must be as pragmatic as we are passionate; as strategic as we are resolute. When threatened, we must respond with force – but when that force can be targeted, we need not deploy large armies overseas. When innocents are being slaughtered and global security endangered, we don’t have to choose between standing idly by or acting on our own. Instead, we must rally international action, which we are doing in Libya, where we do not have a single soldier on the ground, but are supporting allies in protecting the Libyan people and giving them the chance to determine their destiny.

In all that we do, we must remember that what sets America apart is not solely our power – it is the principles upon which our union was founded. We are a nation that brings our enemies to justice while adhering to the rule of law, and respecting the rights of all our citizens. We protect our own freedom and prosperity by extending it to others. We stand not for empire, but for self-determination. That is why we have a stake in the democratic aspirations that are now washing across the Arab World. We will support those revolutions with fidelity to our ideals, with the power of our example, and with an unwavering belief that all human beings deserve to live with freedom and dignity.

Above all, we are a nation whose strength abroad has been anchored in opportunity for our citizens at home. Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war, at a time of rising debt and hard economic times. Now, we must invest in America’s greatest resource – our people. We must unleash innovation that creates new jobs and industry, while living within our means. We must rebuild our infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy. And most of all, after a decade of passionate debate, we must recapture the common purpose that we shared at the beginning of this time of war. For our nation draws strength from our differences, and when our union is strong no hill is too steep and no horizon is beyond our reach.

America, it is time to focus on nation building here at home.

In this effort, we draw inspiration from our fellow Americans who have sacrificed so much on our behalf. To our troops, our veterans and their families, I speak for all Americans when I say that we will keep our sacred trust with you, and provide you with the care, and benefits, and opportunity that you deserve.

I met some of those patriotic Americans at Fort Campbell. A while back, I spoke to the 101st Airborne that has fought to turn the tide in Afghanistan, and to the team that took out Osama bin Laden. Standing in front of a model of bin Laden’s compound, the Navy SEAL who led that effort paid tribute to those who had been lost – brothers and sisters in arms whose names are now written on bases where our troops stand guard overseas, and on headstones in quiet corners of our country where their memory will never be forgotten. This officer - like so many others I have met with on bases, in Baghdad and Bagram, at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval Hospital – spoke with humility about how his unit worked together as one – depending on each other, and trusting one another, as a family might do in a time of peril.

That’s a lesson worth remembering – that we are all a part of one American family. Though we have known disagreement and division, we are bound together by the creed that is written into our founding documents, and a conviction that the United States of America is a country that can achieve whatever it sets out to accomplish. Now, let us finish the work at hand. Let us responsibly end these wars, and reclaim the American Dream that is at the center of our story. With confidence in our cause; with faith in our fellow citizens; and with hope in our hearts, let us go about the work of extending the promise of America – for this generation, and the next. May God bless our troops. And may God bless the United States of America.

jueves, 28 de abril de 2011

La independencia energética que necesitamos

Por Luis Fortuño
Gobernador de PR

Por años he sido un firme proponente de que en Puerto Rico tenemos que reducir significativamente nuestra dependencia del petróleo mediante el desarrollo de fuentes alternas de energía como la solar, la de viento, las tecnologías de recuperación de recursos y el gas natural.




Hace apenas tres semanas, el presidente Obama instó a la nación a hacer exactamente lo mismo. ¡Y eso que la emergencia energética que confrontamos en Puerto Rico es mucho mayor! Aquí dependemos del petróleo en un 70% para generar nuestra electricidad, mientras que la mayoría de los estados la obtienen de otras fuentes más baratas y limpias, sobre todo del gas natural. Por eso es que aquí la luz es el doble de cara que allá.

Todo el que paga su cuenta de luz mensualmente, o llena el tanque de su automóvil, sabe que estamos en una emergencia de grandes proporciones. Por eso el verano pasado hice un llamado para que aunáramos esfuerzos para acelerar el proceso de sustituir el petróleo por fuentes alternas de energía.




Para ello, aprobamos leyes que facilitan la construcción de proyectos de energía renovable como el sol y el viento, creamos un Fondo de Energía Verde para ayudar a financiar dichos proyectos y nos impusimos metas bien ambiciosas de generación de energía renovable. Además, firmé una Orden Ejecutiva para acelerar, no obviar, los procesos de permisos de todo proyecto de fuentes alternas al petróleo. Aunque siempre haremos las cosas correctamente, la emergencia energética es real y no hay tiempo que perder.

La Autoridad de Energía Eléctrica (AEE) ya ha firmado contratos para la compra de más de 600 megavatios de diversos proyectos de energía renovable, principalmente de sol y viento. Todos son proyectos buenos para nuestro futuro energético, pero los mismos no representarán un ahorro significativo a tu bolsillo a corto plazo porque esas tecnologías siguen siendo caras y van a tomar años en desarrollarse. Por eso es que a corto plazo necesitamos cambiar las plantas generatrices de la AEE de petróleo a gas natural. Y la manera más rápida y segura de hacerlo es con Vía Verde. Otras propuestas de suplido de gas natural a las plantas de la AEE – como la construcción de tanques en la costa norte, o suplir las plantas mediante barcazas – se tomarían años, serían más caras y/o menos seguras que Vía Verde.




Mientras el costo del petróleo ha aumentado más de 30% en lo que va de año, el precio del gas natural está es su nivel más bajo en nueve años. Además de ser mucho más barato que el petróleo, el gas natural es mucho más limpio, mejor para el ambiente y mejor para nuestra salud. Además, el gas natural es seguro, siendo utilizado en todas las partes del mundo con gran regularidad. Por las calles de Washington, DC., Nueva York y otras ciudades discurren tubos de gas natural que suplen energía directamente a los edificios.

Vía Verde cumple a cabalidad con los cinco requisitos que hemos impuesto para el desarrollo de proyectos de energía alterna al petróleo: (1) Con Vía Verde el costo de la luz en tu casa o negocio bajará significativamente; (2) protegemos el ambiente, pues las emanaciones de carbón al ambiente se reducirán a menos de la mitad; (3) es seguro, pues la agencia federal que regula las tuberías de este tipo supervisará su diseño e instalación; (4) se podrá construir solamente si es debidamente aprobado por las agencias federales y estatales pertinentes; y (5) como en todo proyecto en esta administración, Vía Verde se llevará a cabo cumpliendo con los más altos estándares de transparencia y rectitud. De ellos me aseguraré yo personalmente.

Contrario a lo que se ha dicho, la construcción de Vía Verde no ha sido contratada todavía.
Las contrataciones que se han hecho hasta el presente han sido las preliminares requeridas para poder llevar a cabo los estudios ambientales y arqueológicos, la compra de terrenos y el diseño necesario para poder solicitar los permisos estatales y federales. Y todo el mundo sabe que la contratación de dichos servicios preliminares no se subasta; lo que se subasta es la construcción de la obra, lo cual no ha ocurrido todavía.

Se ha cuestionado por qué la AEE contrató una prestigiosa firma de ingeniería local, la cual a su vez subcontrató a expertos de Texas para hacer el diseño. Bien sencillo: localmente no existe el peritaje técnico para hacer el diseño de una obra como ésta que nunca se ha hecho aquí. Sin embargo, la Ley Numero 7 de 1985 requiere que ingenieros con licencia en Puerto Rico sean los que sometan este tipo de proyectos de construcción ante la consideración de las agencias que emiten los permisos. Esta es una práctica común en Puerto Rico y en todo el mundo: una firma local establece una alianza con una firma de afuera y cada una aporta el peritaje que tiene para llevar a cabo el diseño y someter el mismo ante las autoridades reglamentarias.

Otros han alegado que la firma de ingeniería local obtuvo dicho contrato por amistas conmigo. Eso es totalmente falso. Nunca he intervenido, ni intervendré solicitando la contratación de nadie para ningún proyecto específico. Es falso también que en años recientes haya vacacionado con el jefe de esa firma y su familia. Desde que soy funcionario electo (6 años) voy de vacaciones exclusivamente son mi familia inmediata precisamente para evitar comentarios e inuendos de este tipo. Y, contrario a otros que nos precedieron, nadie paga por nuestras vacaciones no compra nuestra ropa.

Finalmente, de cara a la eventual subasta para la contratación de la construcción de Vía Verde, he solicitado al director ejecutivo de la AEE y a la presidenta de su Junta de Directores que se aseguren que dicho proceso se lleva a cabo con la mayor trasparencia. Aunque no es requisito, les he solicitado que inviten a reconocidos expertos, independientes del gobierno, para que sirvan de observadores. Además, he solicitado que utilicen la Internet para proveer información al público en general sobre los procesos de licitación, como lo estamos haciendo con las Alianzas Público Privadas.

Estoy convencido de que en Puerto Rico no vamos a progresar mientras tengamos que seguir pagando más del doble en la luz de lo que pagan nuestros conciudadanos en los estados. Tenemos que movernos rápidamente a fuentes alternas al petróleo. Mi compromiso contigo ha sido, y segura siendo siempre, lograr estos proyectos con total transparencia para bajarte el costo de la luz de forma segura, saludable y en armonía con el ambiente.

jueves, 14 de abril de 2011

Obama endosa Vía Verde

El Proyecto del Presidente Barack Obama es el gas natural

“Ahora, en términos de nuevas fuentes de energía, tenemos unas cuantas opciones diferentes. La primera de ellas es el gas natural.” - Presidente Barack Obama.




El Presidente de los Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, ha usado un discurso presentado en la Universidad de Georgetown, Washington para lanzar un Proyecto para un Futuro Energético Seguro que describe una política nacional de energía completa. Se hizo una mención específica al papel vital que jugara el gas natural, incluyendo en el transporte, dado que los EE.UU. confirmo recientemente enormes depósitos de esquisto. “Ahora, en términos de nuevas fuentes de energía, tenemos una cuantas opciones diferentes. La primera es el gas natural.

Las innovaciones recientes nos han dado la oportunidad de aprovechas las grandes reservas – quizá reservas suficientes para un siglo, reservas para cien años – en el esquito bajo nosotros,” dijo Obama.

Ley GAS NAT

Obama insto a los legisladores a unificarse en un acercamiento bipartidista para aprobar la legislación, encomiando a los políticos por su apoyo a la Ley GAS NAT. “El año pasado, mas de 150 Miembros del Congreso de ambos partidos propusieron leyes que brindan incentivos para el uso de gas natural limpio en lugar de gasolina en nuestros vehículos.”

La Ley GAS NAT, la cual fue introducida en el último Congreso, brindara incentivos para el uso de gas natural en los vehículos, para la compra de nuevos GNV, para la instalación de estaciones de llenado de gas natural y para la producción de vehículos a gas natural en América. El Representante Estadounidense John Sullivan (R-OK) dice que la Ley GAS NAT de 2011 se introducirá en el Congreso actual el 6 de abril.

El petróleo convirtió al gas natural en campeón y cabildero, dijo T. Boone a principios de semana, “Pienso que haremos que [la Ley GAS NAT] pase por la Casa de Representantes antes del receso de verano.”

NGVAmerica, la asociación de comercio que representa a la industria estadounidense de los vehículos a gas natural, aclamo el llamado del Presidente Obama para la aprobación de la Ley GAS NAT como parte del proyecto. “Nosotros elogiamos al Presidente por reconocer el importante papel que los vehículos a gas natural deben jugar – y jugaran – para ayudar al país a dejar de depender del petróleo extranjero, y hacerlo rápidamente, y, de manera importante, por su llamado a la aprobación de la Ley GAS NAT,” dijo Douglas Clark, Presidente de NGVAmerica y Presidente de Servicios Metropolitanos para el Distrito de Omaha, Nebraska.

La Ley tiene amplio apoyo, incluyendo el soporte de la Conferencia de Alcaldes de EE.UU. a mediados de 2010.

Incentivos en relación a GNV

NGVAmerica resalta las iniciativas relacionadas a GNV propuestas por el Presidente:

“Predicar con el Ejemplo Con la Flota Federal” llamando a las agencias directivas para asegurar que, para el 2015, todos los vehículos nuevos que se compren para la flota de 600,000 vehículos del gobierno federal sean vehículos a combustibles alternos. La industria de vehículos a gas natural ya produce una amplia – y creciente – variedad de vehículos que funcionan a gas natural para el mercado Estadounidense, desde un Honda Civic hasta un tractor para tráiler de 18 ruedas. “Los GNV pueden dar servicio a virtualmente cualquier necesidad no militar del gobierno federal, y estamos listos para ayudar al gobierno a cumplir sus metas,” dijo Clark.

“Desarrollar Alternativas al Petróleo, Incluyendo los Biocombustibles y el Gas Natural”: Con el apoyo federal apropiado, la disponibilidad del gas natural renovable (o biometano) – producido del gas de los rellenos sanitarios y de los desechos industriales, del drenaje y de los cultivos y animales – podría crecer rápidamente aquí en América. El uso del biometano se está expandiendo rápidamente alrededor del mundo, y se ha mostrado que es el más económico de todos los biocombustibles para vehículos.

Obama reconoció que, “Uno de los mayores problemas que tenemos con la energía alterna no es solo la producción de la energía, sino que también su distribución. Tenemos estaciones de gasolina alrededor del país. Bien, tenemos que tener el mismo tipo de red de distribución cuando se trate de nuestras fuentes de energía renovable…” Él hablo de “invertir en estaciones de llenado” como una de las muchas medidas para fomentar la adopción de combustibles alternos en la transportación.

(This article also available in English)

viernes, 18 de febrero de 2011

ARRA: Un gran impulso a Puerto Rico

Por Pedro Pierluisi

El Plan de Estímulo Federal producto de la Ley para la Recuperación y Reinversión Americana, ARRA por sus siglas en inglés, ha tenido un impacto significativo en la economía de Puerto Rico. En momentos de gran crisis económica, no sólo en la isla sino en los Estados Unidos y por todo el mundo desarrollado, la inversión de miles de millones de dólares en Puerto Rico no pudo haber llegado en un momento más oportuno.


La creación de empleos y la recuperación económica fueron sin duda la meta principal de ARRA. De igual forma, asistir a personas desplazadas, aumentar las ayudas federales directas al pueblo, y salvar empleos en peligro motivaron las diversas medidas del estímulo federal. El Gobernador Luis Fortuño creó un Grupo de Trabajo Interagencial para velar por el rápido desembolso de estos fondos y para garantizar el buen uso de los mismos. Puerto Rico ha estado entre los primeros estados en cumplir con las exigencias impuestas por el gobierno federal en casi todos los renglones de su programa de estímulo. Asimismo, el modelo de tener un ente central que supervise la distribución de los fondos ARRA ha sido elogiado por las autoridades federales, ya que ofrece doble verificación en los proceso de reporte al gobierno federal.

Hasta el momento, a Puerto Rico se le han asignado casi siete mil millones de dólares ($6,973,900,000) en fondos ARRA. De éstos, ya sobre cuatro mil millones ($4,633,700,000) han sido desembolsados en la isla. Gran parte de ese dinero ha ido directamente a nuestra gente, como por ejemplo, el aumento en el PAN, los incentivos a veteranos y pensionados del Seguro Social, y el Beneficio por Trabajo llamado “Make Work Pay”, mediante el cual las personas que trabajan recibieron hasta $400 tanto en el 2009 como en el 2010.

El Departamento de Educación ha sido uno de los principales beneficiarios de los fondos de estímulo con $638 millones, adicional a la porción del Fondo de Estabilización Estatal que le asignó el Gobernador para aumentar sus programas educativos y mejorar la planta física de muchas escuelas. Cientos de escuelas recibieron fondos para mejoras que han impactado a sobre 50,000 estudiantes. Además, nuestra administración destinará sobre $700 millones para rehabilitar 95 escuelas y construir 5 nuevas utilizando el programa de Bonos de Construcción para Escuelas creado por ARRA. Esta inversión ayudará a modernizar la infraestructura de los planteles educativos y mejorará el aprovechamiento académico de nuestros jóvenes.

La infraestructura de Puerto Rico también se ha nutrido de los fondos del estímulo federal. Sobre 20 grandes proyectos de mejoras a carreteras, rehabilitación de puentes y compra de guaguas híbridas son algunos de los logros que nos impactan a diario. Por otro lado, la Autoridad de Acueductos y Alcantarillados ha encaminado proyectos por un valor de $158 millones, aprovechando una asignación de casi $100 millones de fondos ARRA. Recientemente visité el barrio Ingenio de Toa Baja donde se puede palpar el impacto que están teniendo estas obras en la calidad de vida de nuestra gente.

Más aún, múltiples otras áreas han sido impactadas gracias a estos fondos. Por ejemplo, casi 9,000 familias se están beneficiando de 46 proyectos de remodelación y modernización de vivienda pública. Además, incentivado por ARRA, nuestro gobierno ha desarrollado un plan aprobado por el Departamento de Energía de los Estados Unidos que establece programas de eficiencia energética en las agencias locales, así como provee incentivos a empresas y ciudadanos para la conservación de energía y la adquisición de enseres más eficientes. A su vez los municipios han hecho lo propio para recibir subvenciones federales de energía renovable y de ahorro energético.

También por vía de ARRA el Departamento del Trabajo recibió un aumento en fondos de desempleo y de readiestramiento para ayudar a los desempleados. De igual forma, el Departamento de Salud tuvo un incremento de fondos para los programas de Mi Salud y WIC para nuestras familias necesitadas. Asimismo, el Departamento de la Familia, la Policía, el Departamento de Justicia, la Junta de Calidad Ambiental, muchas otras agencias y todos los municipios obtuvieron fondos adicionales para el beneficio de Puerto Rico. Conjuntamente, múltiples instituciones educativas como la UPR y otras universidades, así como un sinnúmero de organizaciones sin fines de lucro en Puerto Rico, lograron competir para nuevas oportunidades de investigación y de ayuda social, y recibieron fondos ARRA.

Desde sus inicios, el impacto de la Ley de Recuperación y Reinversión Americana en Puerto Rico se ha sentido a todo nivel. Por eso, junto a las políticas económicas de la administración del Gobernador Fortuño, ARRA le ha dado un gran impulso a Puerto Rico.

sábado, 12 de febrero de 2011

Governor of Puerto Rico Luis Fortuño at CPAC 2011

Remarks for Governor Luis Fortuño
CPAC Washington D.C. Conference
11 a.m. EST, Marriott Ballroom
February 11, 2011

Good morning. Thank you, Don, for that kind introduction.

It is great to be with you all today, and to have the opportunity to talk about the exciting, new path that the American people have chosen for this country.



Our country voted to change the way Washington is working and it is our responsibility to provide that change.

Two years ago in Puerto Rico, we similarly voted to change the way our government was working because it was also spending beyond what the people could afford.

Some have asked if those of us who cherish freedom and individual liberty can win the Hispanic vote while upholding our principles? Well, in Puerto Rico, we’ve done it.

As a Conservative Republican, I’ve been elected island-wide twice in the last 5 years. In 2008, I was elected by the biggest margin of electoral victory in 44 years.

We also had victories that included two-thirds of the seats in both houses of the State Legislature.

Why did we prevail when the votes were counted? Because when government is growing its own economy at the expense of the real economy - the people’s economy - Americans will choose freedom, opportunity and growth.

We must act now through steady leadership and bold action to take on the big challenges we face with honesty and courage. We must show that our brightest days are ahead and that we can reignite America’s engine of growth.

We need to put our faith in the hopes and dreams and plans of the citizens of this country, because they can out-think,out-dream, out-work and out-produce anybody in the world, as long as they are rewarded fairly when they do it.

That’s exactly what we are doing in Puerto Rico.

Through the tough decisions we made early in my Administration, we are addressing an inherited fiscal crisis that was the worst in the nation.

When I took office two years ago, we had been experiencing the deepest recession since the 1930s, a recession that began two full years before it commenced in the rest of the country.

I inherited a $3.3 billion budget deficit - proportionally speaking, the largest state budget deficit in the country, representing 44 percent of revenues.

Puerto Rico’s credit rating was on the verge of junk status, and I actually had to fly up to meet with the rating agencies before I was sworn in to avoid a downgrade of our bonds.

And after I was sworn in, we didn’t even have money to meet our first payroll. We had to take out a loan to pay it.

We immediately enacted fiscal emergency legislation, with the support of our Legislature, requiring serious spending cuts.

Encouraged by a clear mandate from taxpayers, in just two years, we have cut government expenses by 20 percent. Here’s what we did:


-I took a 10 percent pay cut and agency heads took a 5 percent cut;

-We froze all salaries for two fiscal years;

-We cut government services contracts by 15 percent;

-We cut government operating expenses 10 percent, including official vehicles, cell phones, and credit cards;

-We reduced political appointments by 30 percent;

-We shrank the government employee ranks by 17,000 through a combination of voluntary and mandatory measures. Another voluntary early retirement window enabled us to trim an additional 4,000 last month.

-We reduced the number of government agencies through consolidation;

-And we closed-out our defined benefit pension plan and moved to a performance based defined
contribution plan for future government employees.


We didn’t shy away from the tough decisions. In just two years, our progress is clear and compelling on both, the fiscal and economic side.

We have cut expenses and brought down the budget deficit from 44 percent to 11 percent of revenues. That includes cutting 17 percent of total payroll. And we are on course to balance our budget before the end of my first term.

We’ve reduced our deficit proportionally more than any other state or territory. In a ranking of all the states by budget deficit, as a percentage of revenues, we started of dead last. Now, we are ranked 20th in the country and closing in.

The rating agencies have noticed. They all increased our bond rating to its highest level in 35 years and granted us a “positive” outlook for the first time since 1983.

Now that we have stabilized the economy, we have turned our full focus to restoring growth, and creating the best business climate in the country. We turned to a model where entrepreneurship and innovation are the drivers of economic growth and opportunity, not government.

The debate has already begun at the national level on fundamental tax reform and addressing a tax regime that puts American business at a competitive disadvantage around the globe.

Puerto Rico, as a U.S. territory, has a code that is a mirror image of the Internal Revenue Code. We faced the same challenge in that high taxes – especially on the corporate side – have hindered our competitiveness.

I am convinced that $1 dollar in our taxpayers’ hands will be used more effectively that if that same dollar remains in the government’s hands. Thus, we just approved the largest across-the-board tax cuts at the individual and corporate level in our history.

Starting January of this year, we cut the top corporate rate from 41 percent to 30 percent. The previous seven-tier corporate bracket has been flattened, and in three years, the top corporate rate will drop to 25 percent.

For individuals, tax rates will drop an average of 25 percent this year, increasing to a nearly 50 percent reduction over six years.

To ensure that we sustain fiscal responsibility, individual tax reductions for years 2014 through 2016 will be contingent on the government meeting targeted goals to guarantee that we continue to balance our budget.

Thus, we are making the taxpayer the watchdog for fiscal discipline, and ensuring government keeps that discipline. In addition to the tax reform plan, we have instituted other significant planks in our reform agenda to promote growth and create jobs.

We enacted one of the most advanced and aggressive Public-Private Partnership laws in the country to encourage greater private investment and bring competition and efficiencies to schools, roads, airports, energy, water facilities and other public infrastructure.

We launched a new housing initiative that cuts property and capital gains taxes for buyers and sellers. During the first four months of the program, housing sales increased over 20 percent.

We have some of the highest energy costs in the nation and rely on imported oil for almost 70 percent of our power generation. So we have begun a comprehensive energy program to dramatically reduce our dependence on foreign oil, in favor of natural gas and renewable energy.

We are also merging government agencies to cut duplications, and streamlining operations to be quick, agile and efficient so that government red tape doesn’t get in the way of entrepreneurship and job creation.

A perfect example is the government permitting process. We had government agencies issuing 28 different permits. Now we have 1 permit to do business.

With these reforms, we are convinced that job creation will be spurred, consumers will be stronger, and the economy will be more competitive and prosperous.

I was fortunate in that I had the support of the Legislature and we were able to work as partners to address our challenges comprehensively.

So I think that with big pick-ups in November in Congress, Governors o"ces and state legislatures around the nation, bold leadership is possible. And as you know, the mandate from voters is that bold action in Washington is a must.

So my advice is: Don’t wait and don’t blink. Make the tough decisions early and stick to them with courage.

People are expecting leadership. At the beginning of my term, I went to the Legislature and on TV to tell the public exactly what we faced and what we needed to do to fix it.

Some may not like every decision, but they will respect you for doing what is right and what you said you would do.

The long practice of allowing debt and deficits to grow unchecked has made our country less competitive. It’s time for Government to put its finances on the path of fiscal responsibility.

I am confident that through clear and steady leadership, we will be able to address these challenges, just like many of us are doing around our Nation.

And that brings me back to the important topic I touched upon at the start – reaching out to Hispanics – because this is our time and our opportunity to elevate our pro-growth, pro-family policies and make huge inroads with our Hispanic community around the country.

The late President Reagan said that: “Hispanics are Republicans, they just don’t know it yet.” And he was so right. Actually, I started in the Republican Party as a student in D.C. stuffing envelopes in his campaign.

He brought many of us into the party. And the bottom line here is we are socially conservative, fiscally conservative, we have a natural distrust of government, we want lower taxes, education is key to us, and we want our small and medium-size businesses to flourish. Those are Republican values.

It is clear that Republicans must reach out to Hispanics to build trust. I strongly agree and leave you with this belief. We don’t have to run away from our values and our principles to attract their support. On the contrary, we have to proudly underscore them.

Let’s show America what we can accomplish if we protect individual freedom, promote growth and strengthen our values!

Thank you and God bless you.


Download the Speech in PDF Format.

jueves, 13 de enero de 2011

Obama Pays Tribute to Arizona Shooting Victims in Tucson

Remarks of President Barack Obama
At a Memorial Service for the Victims of the Shooting in Tucson, Arizona
University of Arizona, McKale Memorial Center
Tucson, Arizona
January 12, 2011

To the families of those we’ve lost; to all who called them friends; to the students of this university, the public servants gathered tonight, and the people of Tucson and Arizona: I have come here tonight as an American who, like all Americans, kneels to pray with you today, and will stand by you tomorrow.

There is nothing I can say that will fill the sudden hole torn in your hearts. But know this: the hopes of a nation are here tonight. We mourn with you for the fallen. We join you in your grief. And we add our faith to yours that Representative Gabrielle Giffords and the other living victims of this tragedy pull through.

As Scripture tells us:

There is a river whose streams make glad the city of God,
the holy place where the Most High dwells.
God is within her, she will not fall;
God will help her at break of day.

On Saturday morning, Gabby, her staff, and many of her constituents gathered outside a supermarket to exercise their right to peaceful assembly and free speech. They were fulfilling a central tenet of the democracy envisioned by our founders – representatives of the people answering to their constituents, so as to carry their concerns to our nation’s capital. Gabby called it “Congress on Your Corner” – just an updated version of government of and by and for the people.

That is the quintessentially American scene that was shattered by a gunman’s bullets. And the six people who lost their lives on Saturday – they too represented what is best in America.

Judge John Roll served our legal system for nearly 40 years. A graduate of this university and its law school, Judge Roll was recommended for the federal bench by John McCain twenty years ago, appointed by President George H.W. Bush, and rose to become Arizona’s chief federal judge. His colleagues described him as the hardest-working judge within the Ninth Circuit. He was on his way back from attending Mass, as he did every day, when he decided to stop by and say hi to his Representative. John is survived by his loving wife, Maureen, his three sons, and his five grandchildren.

George and Dorothy Morris – “Dot” to her friends – were high school sweethearts who got married and had two daughters. They did everything together, traveling the open road in their RV, enjoying what their friends called a 50-year honeymoon. Saturday morning, they went by the Safeway to hear what their Congresswoman had to say. When gunfire rang out, George, a former Marine, instinctively tried to shield his wife. Both were shot. Dot passed away.

A New Jersey native, Phyllis Schneck retired to Tucson to beat the snow. But in the summer, she would return East, where her world revolved around her 3 children, 7 grandchildren, and 2 year-old great-granddaughter. A gifted quilter, she’d often work under her favorite tree, or sometimes sew aprons with the logos of the Jets and the Giants to give out at the church where she volunteered. A Republican, she took a liking to Gabby, and wanted to get to know her better.

Dorwan and Mavy Stoddard grew up in Tucson together – about seventy years ago. They moved apart and started their own respective families, but after both were widowed they found their way back here, to, as one of Mavy’s daughters put it, “be boyfriend and girlfriend again.” When they weren’t out on the road in their motor home, you could find them just up the road, helping folks in need at the Mountain Avenue Church of Christ. A retired construction worker, Dorwan spent his spare time fixing up the church along with their dog, Tux. His final act of selflessness was to dive on top of his wife, sacrificing his life for hers.

Everything Gabe Zimmerman did, he did with passion – but his true passion was people. As Gabby’s outreach director, he made the cares of thousands of her constituents his own, seeing to it that seniors got the Medicare benefits they had earned, that veterans got the medals and care they deserved, that government was working for ordinary folks. He died doing what he loved – talking with people and seeing how he could help. Gabe is survived by his parents, Ross and Emily, his brother, Ben, and his fiancée, Kelly, who he planned to marry next year.

And then there is nine year-old Christina Taylor Green. Christina was an A student, a dancer, a gymnast, and a swimmer. She often proclaimed that she wanted to be the first woman to play in the major leagues, and as the only girl on her Little League team, no one put it past her. She showed an appreciation for life uncommon for a girl her age, and would remind her mother, “We are so blessed. We have the best life.” And she’d pay those blessings back by participating in a charity that helped children who were less fortunate.

Our hearts are broken by their sudden passing. Our hearts are broken – and yet, our hearts also have reason for fullness.

Our hearts are full of hope and thanks for the 13 Americans who survived the shooting, including the congresswoman many of them went to see on Saturday. I have just come from the University Medical Center, just a mile from here, where our friend Gabby courageously fights to recover even as we speak. And I can tell you this – she knows we’re here and she knows we love her and she knows that we will be rooting for her throughout what will be a difficult journey.

And our hearts are full of gratitude for those who saved others. We are grateful for Daniel Hernandez, a volunteer in Gabby’s office who ran through the chaos to minister to his boss, tending to her wounds to keep her alive. We are grateful for the men who tackled the gunman as he stopped to reload. We are grateful for a petite 61 year-old, Patricia Maisch, who wrestled away the killer’s ammunition, undoubtedly saving some lives. And we are grateful for the doctors and nurses and emergency medics who worked wonders to heal those who’d been hurt.

These men and women remind us that heroism is found not only on the fields of battle. They remind us that heroism does not require special training or physical strength. Heroism is here, all around us, in the hearts of so many of our fellow citizens, just waiting to be summoned – as it was on Saturday morning.

Their actions, their selflessness, also pose a challenge to each of us. It raises the question of what, beyond the prayers and expressions of concern, is required of us going forward. How can we honor the fallen? How can we be true to their memory?

You see, when a tragedy like this strikes, it is part of our nature to demand explanations – to try to impose some order on the chaos, and make sense out of that which seems senseless. Already we’ve seen a national conversation commence, not only about the motivations behind these killings, but about everything from the merits of gun safety laws to the adequacy of our mental health systems. Much of this process, of debating what might be done to prevent such tragedies in the future, is an essential ingredient in our exercise of self-government.

But at a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized – at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differently than we do – it’s important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds.

Scripture tells us that there is evil in the world, and that terrible things happen for reasons that defy human understanding. In the words of Job, “when I looked for light, then came darkness.” Bad things happen, and we must guard against simple explanations in the aftermath.

For the truth is that none of us can know exactly what triggered this vicious attack. None of us can know with any certainty what might have stopped those shots from being fired, or what thoughts lurked in the inner recesses of a violent man’s mind.

So yes, we must examine all the facts behind this tragedy. We cannot and will not be passive in the face of such violence. We should be willing to challenge old assumptions in order to lessen the prospects of violence in the future.

But what we can’t do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on one another. As we discuss these issues, let each of us do so with a good dose of humility. Rather than pointing fingers or assigning blame, let us use this occasion to expand our moral imaginations, to listen to each other more carefully, to sharpen our instincts for empathy, and remind ourselves of all the ways our hopes and dreams are bound together.

After all, that’s what most of us do when we lose someone in our family – especially if the loss is unexpected. We’re shaken from our routines, and forced to look inward. We reflect on the past. Did we spend enough time with an aging parent, we wonder. Did we express our gratitude for all the sacrifices they made for us? Did we tell a spouse just how desperately we loved them, not just once in awhile but every single day?

So sudden loss causes us to look backward – but it also forces us to look forward, to reflect on the present and the future, on the manner in which we live our lives and nurture our relationships with those who are still with us. We may ask ourselves if we’ve shown enough kindness and generosity and compassion to the people in our lives. Perhaps we question whether we are doing right by our children, or our community, and whether our priorities are in order. We recognize our own mortality, and are reminded that in the fleeting time we have on this earth, what matters is not wealth, or status, or power, or fame – but rather, how well we have loved, and what small part we have played in bettering the lives of others.

That process of reflection, of making sure we align our values with our actions – that, I believe, is what a tragedy like this requires. For those who were harmed, those who were killed – they are part of our family, an American family 300 million strong. We may not have known them personally, but we surely see ourselves in them. In George and Dot, in Dorwan and Mavy, we sense the abiding love we have for our own husbands, our own wives, our own life partners. Phyllis – she’s our mom or grandma; Gabe our brother or son. In Judge Roll, we recognize not only a man who prized his family and doing his job well, but also a man who embodied America’s fidelity to the law. In Gabby, we see a reflection of our public spiritedness, that desire to participate in that sometimes frustrating, sometimes contentious, but always necessary and never-ending process to form a more perfect union.

And in Christina…in Christina we see all of our children. So curious, so trusting, so energetic and full of magic.

So deserving of our love.

And so deserving of our good example. If this tragedy prompts reflection and debate, as it should, let’s make sure it’s worthy of those we have lost. Let’s make sure it’s not on the usual plane of politics and point scoring and pettiness that drifts away with the next news cycle.

The loss of these wonderful people should make every one of us strive to be better in our private lives – to be better friends and neighbors, co-workers and parents. And if, as has been discussed in recent days, their deaths help usher in more civility in our public discourse, let’s remember that it is not because a simple lack of civility caused this tragedy, but rather because only a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to our challenges as a nation, in a way that would make them proud. It should be because we want to live up to the example of public servants like John Roll and Gabby Giffords, who knew first and foremost that we are all Americans, and that we can question each other’s ideas without questioning each other’s love of country, and that our task, working together, is to constantly widen the circle of our concern so that we bequeath the American dream to future generations.

I believe we can be better. Those who died here, those who saved lives here – they help me believe. We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us. I believe that for all our imperfections, we are full of decency and goodness, and that the forces that divide us are not as strong as those that unite us.

That’s what I believe, in part because that’s what a child like Christina Taylor Green believed. Imagine: here was a young girl who was just becoming aware of our democracy; just beginning to understand the obligations of citizenship; just starting to glimpse the fact that someday she too might play a part in shaping her nation’s future. She had been elected to her student council; she saw public service as something exciting, something hopeful. She was off to meet her congresswoman, someone she was sure was good and important and might be a role model. She saw all this through the eyes of a child, undimmed by the cynicism or vitriol that we adults all too often just take for granted.

I want us to live up to her expectations. I want our democracy to be as good as she imagined it. All of us – we should do everything we can to make sure this country lives up to our children’s expectations.

Christina was given to us on September 11th, 2001, one of 50 babies born that day to be pictured in a book called “Faces of Hope.” On either side of her photo in that book were simple wishes for a child’s life. “I hope you help those in need,” read one. “I hope you know all of the words to the National Anthem and sing it with your hand over your heart. I hope you jump in rain puddles.”

If there are rain puddles in heaven, Christina is jumping in them today. And here on Earth, we place our hands over our hearts, and commit ourselves as Americans to forging a country that is forever worthy of her gentle, happy spirit.

May God bless and keep those we’ve lost in restful and eternal peace. May He love and watch over the survivors. And may He bless the United States of America.