Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Kenneth McClintock. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Kenneth McClintock. Mostrar todas las entradas

viernes, 30 de marzo de 2012

McClintock calls for elimination of trade barriers between Puerto Rico and US mainland

Honorable Kenneth D. McClintock
Secretary of State of Puerto Rico
 Welcoming Remarks
Domestic Trade Roundtable Summit 2012
Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce of Florida
Ponce, Puerto Rico
March 29, 2012


First, I would like to thank Elizabeth Cuevas-Neunder, Founder and CEO of the Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce of Florida for having invited me to appear before you this evening. I am honored by the invitation and quite pleased to see among you so many friends…

Congratulations are also in order to Elizabeth who has done such a great job in developing the Chamber into an important tool for opening and developing trade between Florida and Puerto Rico.

Judging from the approximately 850,000 Puerto Ricans living in Florida one could say that the island is colonizing the American peninsula… and who could be surprised if, after all, Florida and the United States was discovered by a Puerto Rican…

I guess that chapter was not included in your history book… But I am speaking, of course, of Juan Ponce De León who, while being Governor of Puerto Rico, set out from the Island an expedition in search for the Fountain of Youth.

            To those of you who are looking at me in disbelief, you are right… Ponce De León was born in Spain, just as I was born in London. But… should place of birth disqualify Ponce De León or McClintock as a Puerto Rican? Of course not! He was, after all, the first Governor of Puerto Rico as I am its 22nd Secretary of State…

Not convinced? Think of California… Of the 38 governors of California, 29 were born in other states and two were born in Europe… Who would say that Arnold Schwarzenegger is not a “real citizen” of “Cahl-ifoh-nia”?

            There you have it… a historical tidbit that you may not have known about Florida and that you can proudly pass to your friends and business partners when you return home.
            When I address business and professional organizations that visit the Island, I usually extoll on the many attributes that make Puerto Rico such a great place to invest and do business... in sum, on why Puerto Rico Does it Better. But I was to do that with you, I would be preaching to the choir.

            One of the key reasons why the Puerto Rico consumer market is so attractive to Florida businesses is that Puerto Rico is the only U.S. territory which is included in the customs area of the United States together with the 50 States of the Union and the District of Columbia.

            There is, however, a barrier to the free flow of trade between Puerto Rico and the rest of the United States which hurts both Florida and Puerto Rico. And that is the requirement of filing Electronic Export Information (EEI) —previously known as the Shipper’s Export Declaration— for shipments between the States and Puerto Rico which is contained in the Foreign Trade Statistics Regulations (FTSR) and administered by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Inasmuch as commerce between Puerto Rico and the States is interstate rather than foreign commerce, it is unwarranted to impose a requirement that is designed to enable the Census Bureau to compile foreign trade statistics and various federal agencies to enforce laws relating to exporting. Moreover, continuing to impose the EEI requirement would make Puerto Rico’s participation in the U.S. Customs area and the application of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause to Puerto Rico virtually meaningless.

Among the key purposes of the Commerce Clause is to promote an American common market system and thereby foster economic growth. However, requiring EEI filings is tantamount to placing a boundary that separates Puerto Rico from the rest of the nation to the detriment of the Islands’ economic well-being.

Complying with that requirement not only adds a cost that increases the price of many goods, but also imposes an unnecessary burden on interstate commerce that restricts the flow of trade within the U.S.

The EEI barrier also impedes some businesses —particularly, shipping companies— from affording Puerto Rico shipping rates that are comparable to those offered for other U.S. destinations.


Moreover, consumers in Puerto Rico should be entitled to receive from the businesses that benefit from the American common market —including the protection provided by the Commerce Clause against discrimination by States— the same treatment as consumers in the States and D.C.

            By means of your participation in the election of the President and your representation in the House and the Senate, as residents of Florida you have the means to influence federal policy-making in ways that are not available to the American citizens of Puerto Rico.

            My plea to you this evening is that you exert that influence so that the U.S. Commerce Department takes the necessary steps to amend the Foreign Trade Statistics Regulations so that EEI is no longer required for goods shipped between the States and Puerto Rico.

            Trade is not a zero-sum game… It is a win-win relationship were both parties to a transaction benefit. And by doing away with the EEI requirement for shipments to the Island, both Florida and Puerto Rico will benefit.

Thank you very much.

sábado, 21 de enero de 2012

Paridad versus Igualdad

Por Kenneth McClintock Hernández,
Secretario de Estado de Puerto Rico y 1er. Presidente de PRSSA

Hace unos días se suscitó una controversia en torno a unas expresiones del Secretario de Salud, doctor Lorenzo González, en torno a los niveles de fondos que se reciben en Puerto Rico para atender las condiciones de SIDA/HIV en las que, esencialmente, éste señaló que solo bajo la Estadidad podría disfrutar igualdad en los programas federales para atender estas condiciones.  Lorenzo tenía razón.

Hay una gran diferencia entre “paridad” e “igualdad”.

Cuando el territorio de Puerto Rico recibe  exactamente la misma cantidad de recursos en un programa federal a lo que recibiría si fuéramos estado, se alcanza una condición de “paridad”, pero no de igualdad.

A principios de la década del ’70, se extendió a Puerto Rico el programa de cupones de alimentos y comenzamos a recibir exactamente la misma cantidad de fondos que los que recibiríamos bajo ese programa federal si fuéramos un estado.  Alcanzamos la paridad numérica.  Sin embargo, acontecimientos subsiguientes demostraron que no habíamos alcanzado la “igualdad”.

Poco después que asumió el mando, el Presidente Ronald Reagan comenzó a buscar dónde recortar gastos federales.  Los senadores y congresistas de estados con grandes cantidades de beneficiarios de los cupones de alimentos, al iguakl que de los estados productores de alimentos impidieron que se recortara el programa de cupones de alimentos.  Sin embargo, accedieron a que se hicieran recortes a Puerto Rico.  No siendo un estado, Puerto Rico carecía de la protección de “igualdad”, que implica uniformidad.

Reagan no podia reducirle los cupones de alimentos a un estado sí y  a otros no pero, por ser un territorio, sí le podia quitar la “paridad” que gozaban los beneficiarios del programa de cupones en Puerto Rico.  Nos sacó del programa de cupones y creó el llamado Programa de Asistencia Nutricional en que puertorriqueños indigentes recibirían, no cupones, sino cheques.  Ah, y de paso, mucho menos en cheque que lo que recibían en cupones!

De igual manera, el territorio de Puerto Rico podría llegar a recibir los mismos fondos que un estado en determinado programa federal y alcanzar la paridad, la paridad pero no la igualdad.  Para ser iguales---mismos fondos, igual trato, protegidos de que nos quiten o reduzcan lo que no le quiten o reduzcan a otros---para eso hay que votar por y convertirnos en un estado.

El Secretario de Salud, en forma mucho más resumida, en un tono mucho más conversacional, así lo expresó esta semana. Y tiene razón.   No en ánimo de campaña sino en ánimo de aclarar una verdad: No hay igualdad sin estadidad.

domingo, 13 de noviembre de 2011

McClintock remarks at SOMOS Winter Conference 2011

 Keynote remarks
prepared for delivery by
Kenneth D. McClintock
Puerto Rico Secretary of State
SOMOS 2011 Winter Conference
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Veterans Day 2011

Amigas y amigos puertorriqueños... hermanas y hermanos hispanos.  Although I could continue speaking in Spanish, for the benefit of the “culturally-impaired”, I’ll continue in English!

First, I would like to thank SOMOS for their kind invitation… I am very pleased to have been asked to speak at the Puerto Rican/Hispanic Task Force Winter Conference. But I do not want to speak long…

Rather than having you listen to my concerns and my opinions, I would like this to be an opportunity to exchange views… to discuss issues… and to strengthen ties with the members of the larger Hispanic community in New York porque nosotros los puertorriqueños somos solidarios con nuestras hermanas y hermanos hispanos.

I would like this to become more of a town hall meeting than a dinner keynote because a town hall meeting helps to bring together the members of the community, however diverse the community is —and, let’s face it, it’s Friday night and who wants to listen to me talking for forty minutes on end…

Latinos are a diverse group, but whether we are from Mexico, Central America, Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, or South America, we are bound together not only by our common history and cultural heritage but also by our concerns and interests… by the goals and objectives that we share.

By bringing together the members of the community, we raise awareness about our common concerns and interests and help foster Hispanic leadership in this great Nation of ours.

A town hall is also the seat of local government… and a town hall meeting is perhaps the best example of participatory and representative democracy in America… Therefore, it would be fitting to begin my remarks by talking about an issue that is at the heart of what representative democracy means…

Hispanics are taking an active part in all areas of endeavor and every institution of our democratic society.

Hispanics are having an ever growing influence in the arts and culture, and we are seeing more and more Hispanics in the national media.

Our purchasing power has also been increasing and we are in the marketing plan of every major company in the United States. In 2009, Hispanics accounted for more than 9% of total buying power, compared to less than 4% in 1980. The buying power of Hispanics exceeded $1 trillion in 2010, and the population includes a significant number of high-income households.

We are doing better in business. Hispanics in the United States have been opening businesses at a rate that is three times as fast as the national average. We are driving economic growth and creating jobs.

Make no mistake about it. Immigrants, and the sons and daughters of immigrants, helped to build this great Nation of ours and Hispanics will help to bring this Nation out of recession.

And, more Hispanics become appointed to key positions in the federal government such as the Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs at The White House.

Cecilia Muñoz, the highest-ranking Hispanic in the Executive Office of The President, oversees the Obama Administration’s relationships with state and local governments. She has done an extraordinary job at keeping Puerto Rico issues at the top of the agendas of cabinet members. Not only does she lead and follow-through, but she is also available at all times. And I can tell you from my experience in government that finding all three is not a common sight at that high level.

Had it not been for her, President Obama probably wouyld not have broken last June 14th the 49 and a half year spell of Presidents not visiting Puerto Rico.  While she doesn’t have a pilot’s license, she was certainly the driving force when Air Force One flew over our skies five months ago!

But in the White House, she’s not only in charge of Puerto Rico-related issues although we like to see her that way here, but in charge of relations with all local governments and intergovernmental organizations, such as the National Governors Association, the National Conference of State Legislatures,  the Council of State Governments that I chaired 13 years ago and, among others, two I’m now active in, the National Lieutenant Governors Association as well as the National Association of Secretaries of State.   And they all speak highly of Cecilia.

Other Hispanics providing leadership in the Obama administration come to mind among which are: Ambassador Carlos Pascual, Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs at the State Department; Julissa Reynoso, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs who was recently appointed as U.S. Ambassador to Paraguay; Anna Gómez, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information; Bill Ramos, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs at the Office of the Secretary of Commerce; and James Albino, Program Manager at the Office of National AIDS Policy of The White House.

Yet Hispanics, including Puerto Ricans, are still underrepresented in politics.  In the case of Puerto Ricans who live in the Islands it is not a question of under-representation, but rather of lack of representation.

The nearly 4 million American citizens that reside in Puerto Rico… 4 million Latinos… have no proportional or voting representation in the U.S. House of Representatives… no representation whatsoever in the U.S. Senate and no direct participation in the election of the President and Vice President.

While Congress adopts legislation that the American citizens of Puerto Rico must abide, our only representation in Congress is a Resident Commissioner in the House that cannot vote on the floor.  And our only participation in the election of the President is choosing the delegates to the national political party conventions. This is simply undemocratic.

I make no secret of the fact that I favor Puerto Rico becoming a State---if you didn’t get that in the panel discussion this afternoon, you must’ve been on the beach! But this is not about political status preferences or party politics. This goes to the heart of democracy. Let me quote from three lifelong advocates of Puerto Rico’s current political status known as “commonwealth” or “estado libre asociado”.

In February 2002 former Governor Sila Calderón was interviewed by the South Florida Sun-Sentinel about a voting registration drive the Government of Puerto Rico was conducting in the States and which she described as “an effort to empower Puerto Ricans politically so that they can be a voice in the issues that affect them.”

Regarding the situation of Puerto Ricans in the Islands, Governor Calderon said:
We need a solution to this problem of lack of representation.
Which particular solution at this point, I cannot tell you. But it is something we must deal with because there are so many (U.S.) laws that apply to Puerto Rico in which we have no representation and no participation.

Former Governor Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, in his remarks at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy’s School of Government on April 26th 2002 —he was Resident Commissioner at the time— referred to “the problem of the current democratic asymmetry in the US-Puerto Rico relationship”, recognizing the existence of the same problem: that we have no participation in the decisions that are made in Washington.

Former Governor Rafael Hernández-Colón, published an article in the 1998 July/August edition of Foreign Affairs magazine entitled, “Doing Right by Puerto Rico: Congress Must Act.”  In that article, he made the following assertion: “All factions do agree on the need to end the present undemocratic arrangement, whereby Puerto Rico is subject to the laws of Congress but cannot vote in it [emphasis provided].”

At Harvard, Governor Acevedo Vilá spoke of building a new consensus, but it seems that we are already before a strong one. The current political status is unacceptable and we need to give the people a full self-government choice.

Has Congress lived-up to its responsibility in making possible that choice? No. On three occasions the U.S. Senate had the opportunity to take action on bills passed in the House —in 1998 with H.R. 856; in 2007 with H.R. 900; and in 2010 H.R. 2499— but didn’t.

And because Congress has failed to take action to solve Puerto Rico’s political status problem, Hispanics are losing the opportunity to have a larger and more powerful voice in our Nation’s Capital.  Think of this: if Puerto Rico were a State, Hispanics would have two more Senators and five more Representatives in Congress. And, would immigration reform be held-up in a Congress with a full delegation of Senators and Representatives from Puerto Rico? I don’t think so!

It is not that Congress has failed to give sufficient consideration to this question.  During the last 20 years Congress has devoted a prodigious amount of time to discuss the question Puerto Rico’s political status.  But the time spent on hearings did not translate into a law to provide the American citizens of Puerto Rico the opportunity to choose among status options that are constitutionally sound, politically viable, and involve a full measure of self-government.

In fact, during the one hundred and twelve years after the annexation of Puerto Rico, Congress did not sponsor a single plebiscite to resolve the Islands’ political status.

Let me quote once more from former Governor Hernández Colón’s article in FOREIGN AFFAIRS:
“It is morally unacceptable, unfair, and harmful to Puerto Rico and the United States for Congress to relegate the issue to business as usual —that is, do nothing, wait for a Puerto Rican initiative, play with it for a while but take no action, wait for the next initiative, and repeat the cycle.  Such insensitivity undermines Puerto Rico’s capacity for self-government, inflicts considerable hardship on its society, and drains the U.S. Treasury.”

We could not keep waiting for Congress. That is why the administration of Governor Fortuño has taken action to establish a two-step process by which the people of Puerto Rico can choose a final and permanent political status with full self-government.

The first step will be a referendum to be held on August 12, 2012. Voters will be asked whether they want to maintain the current status under the territorial clause of the U.S. Constitution or whether they prefer a non-territorial option.

If more voters choose a non-territorial option, a plebiscite would take place on the same day as the general election in November 6, 2012, giving voters the three status options recognized by the U.N. General Assembly as full-self-government choices: statehood, independence or free association.

At the heart of this issue is that the founders of this Nation meant for the citizenship of the United States to be a source of equal rights but that four million American citizens who reside in Puerto Rico do not have the same rights as those who live in the States.

If citizenship is to truly be a source of equal rights in America, Puerto Rico’s political status must change. The options are obvious: either the people of Puerto Rico continue to be American citizens with all its rights and responsibilities under statehood or they achieve separate sovereignty be it under complete independence or a compact of free association with the United States.

Some may ask, why am I addressing this? I’ll tell you… Because Puerto Ricans in the States and in the Islands need to stand together…

…because Puerto Ricans in the Islands and Latinos in the States are part of the same fabric…

…because Puerto Rico’s political status problem diminishes the political power of Hispanics in the States.

…and because the voting and representation rights that Puerto Rican’s in the Islands lack underscore the value of the exercising the rights that you have in the States.

To those Puerto Ricans who live in the States; I would like to ask: Do you feel boricua? Of course you do… You don’t feel any less boricua because you can vote.

Los boricuas en la Isla y en los estados ya estamos unidos por la identidad de la cultura; es hora que también estemos unidos por el poder del voto. Y, cuando todos los puertorriqueños —los de aquí y los de allá— tengamos el poder del voto, entonces sí que nadie podrá detenernos.

For now, Puerto Ricans who live in the Islands cannot vote to elect Senators or Representatives to Congress and cannot vote to elect the President but those of you who live in the States can and should vote.

Voting is not an option but a necessary and fundamental part of being a citizen in a democratic society and if you are registered to vote not only are you equipped to further you own goals and objectives… but can also be solidarios with the members of the community to which we belong —con nuestras hermanas y hermanos hispanos.

Can your vote make a difference? The answer is an unequivocal and resounding yes!

History provides many examples of how a single vote changed the course of entire nations.  Let me give you an example. Most of us would not conceive of this country without Texas being a part of it, but Texas may not have been admitted into the Union if it was not because of the vote of a farmer in the backwoods of Switzerland County, Indiana, named Freeman Clark.

On Election Day in 1844 Freeman Clark laid seriously ill in bed. He begged his sons to carry him to the county seat so he could vote for David Kelso, the Democratic candidate for the State Senate. Clark owed him. David Kelso had defended Clark on a murder charge and obtained his acquittal. The old farmer got to vote for Kelso but Clark died on his way back home. Guess what? Kelso won the election by one vote…

In 1844 when the new Indiana Senate convened, Democrats had a majority of one —counting, you guessed it, David Kelso. At that time, State senates had the task of electing the States' delegation to the U.S. Senate. The Indiana Senate Democrats held a caucus where a majority of the party delegation favored a man who would vote against the annexation of Texas if elected to the U.S. Senate. David Kelso refused to vote for the Democratic Party choice and a deadlock resulted between the Democratic and Whig candidates. The impasse continued for days. Finally, Kelso made his move. He proposed a new candidate: Edward A. Hannigan. In his party caucus, Kelso notified his Democratic colleagues he would bolt and vote with the Whigs —thus electing a Whig to the U.S. Senate— unless the Democrats supported Hannigan. The Democrats felt constrained to accept Hannigan who was then elected as U.S. Senator for the State of Indiana by one vote —that of David Kelso.

In 1845, Texas was admitted to the Union as a State by one vote —that of Edward A. Hannigan from Indiana. California too was admitted to the Union by a margin of one vote in 1850.

In the 1960 presidential election, one more vote per precinct in the states of Illinois, Missouri, New Jersey, and Texas may have altered the course of America's modern history by denying John F. Kennedy the presidency and placing Richard Nixon in the White House 8 years earlier.

In 1962, the governors of Maine, Rhode Island, and North Dakota were all elected by a margin of one vote per precinct.

Your vote makes a difference and registering to vote is easy.  What is most exciting is that Latinos are one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the United States and they have the potential of transforming the electoral landscape of this country next November as the nation elects the next President of the United States.  In fact, many analysts predict that the presidential race in 2011 will turn on how Latinos vote in several key States.

If one vote can change the course of a nation’s history, just imagine the unrealized potential for change as millions of Hispanic men and women cast their votes.

However, Latinos will only realize their true political potential in this democratic society if you are registered to vote and go to polls. Your vote will make a difference in this country next November.

I will not take more time… As I said, I want to listen to your views.  I would like to close by thanking you for this extraordinary opportunity… gracias por la oportunidad de dirigirme a ustedes… and we look forward to strengthening our ties to Latinos in New York as we endeavor to increase and improve the participation of Hispanics in America.¡Juntos podemos alcanzar nuestras metas y juntos triunfaremos!

Ahora me gustaría escuchar sus comentarios y responder a sus preguntas.  Así que los que tengan preguntas o comentarios por favor levanten la mano.

domingo, 2 de octubre de 2011

Cincuenta por ciento más uno



Por Kenneth D. McClintock Hernández

 El Presidente Barack Obama expresó esta semana que una mayoría absoluta mínima de cincuenta por ciento más un voto del electorado puertorriqueño podría no ser suficiente para aprobar un cambio en la relación política con Puerto Rico. Como es de esperarse, sus expresiones, no producto de un discurso escrito detalladamente elaborado, sino de una contestación impromptu en un período libre de preguntas y respuestas, han levantado un avispero, quizás mayor de lo que él pudiera haberse imaginado.

 En el día de ayer ofrecí la siguiente reacción escrita a un medio que me preguntó sobre esas expresiones del Presidente, las cuales entiendo pero no necesariamente comparto en todos sus detalles:

 "Hay estados, como Nebraska, en que una mera pluralidad fue suficiente para ser admitido y otros, como West Virginia, en que ni tan siquiera se pidió la admisión. Personalmente creo que una mayoría en contra del status quo o a favor de una fórmula de cambio será suficiente, no para cambiar de inmediato nuestra relación presente pero sí para iniciar el proceso de negociación legislativa que conduzca a esa descolonización. 

 A Illinois le tomó solo once meses, pero a Nuevo México 65 años obtener la admisión una vez solicitada, por lo que el proceso no necesariamente será rápido. 

 Mi exhortación a los que, como yo, quieren librar a Puerto Rico de los enormes costos del coloniaje y ser admitido como estado federado de nuestra nación, es que emprendamos la tarea de ganar ambas preguntas de la papeleta plebiscitaria por el mayor margen posible de manera que el nuevo Congreso en el 2013 tenga que enfrentarse a un nuevo paradigma de status de un pueblo que contundentemente le haya retirado a los Estados Unidos cualquier reclamo de "consentimiento de los gobernados" que legitime la relación territorial/colonial actual y una petición mayoritaria para iniciar la negociación de una Ley de Admisión que no cobre vigencia hasta ser ratificada por el pueblo. 

 Como ha dicho el gobernador Luis Fortuño al discrepar de las palabras de Obama, hay 37 ejemplos de que todo territorio que quería entrar a la Unión lo logró, no importa cuan grande o pequeña fuera la mayoría inicial que dio inicio al proceso de admisión---y Luis Fortuño ha estudiado mucho más los procesos de admisión que Barack Obama. 

 No dejemos que la opinión del actual Presidente, o cualquiera de sus potenciales contrincantes, nos divida o nos provea una excusa para la inacción, sino que nos inspire a la acción plebiscitaria que torne el escenario que él plantea irrelevante. A un año o menos de una consulta plebiscitaria, ¡construyamos, no con excusas sino con educación y trabajo ideológico, esas mayorías contundentes, en contra del status quo, y a favor de la Estadidad Federada, que obliguen a la Presidencia y al Congreso a actuar a partir del 2013!"

 A medida que se caliente la campaña electoral presidencial, gubernatorial y plebiscitaria del 2012, los líderes pepedés ( a quienes les aterra la posibilidad de que los electores puertorriqueños se expresen directamente sobre su futuro) tratarán de agarrarse hasta de un clavo caliente, sean con expresiones como la del Presidente, posturas de sus potenciales contrincantes republicanos, palabras de un congresista, un senador, un libro o un informe congresional, para lograr uno o varios objetivos. Entre estos, tratar de dividir a los Estadistas, desanimar a los Estadistas, restarle credibilidad a los Estadistas, o varias o todas las anteriores.

 La realidad es que en apenas un año o menos, los Estadistas tenemos la oportunidad de relegar a la irrelevancia el escenario plebiscitario que plantea el Presidente Obama---que una fórmula de status gane con una mayoría absoluta mínima de poco más del 50% de los votos. Un resultado sólido a favor del cambio, en contra de la relación actual, en la primera pregunta de la papeleta plebiscitaria le negaría a los Estados Unidos la cómoda postura de reclamar que la mayoría de los gobernados ha consentido a la relación actual, postura que ha justificado su inacción en el Congreso (no así en las Casa Blancas de Bush, Clinton, Bush y Obama) y en las Naciones Unidas. De igual forma, un apoyo mayoritario por encima del 50 por ciento a la Estadidad Federada podrá no ser suficiente para que se nos conceda automáticamente, pero sería suficiene para obligar al Gobierno Federal a iniciar el proceso de negociar una Ley Habilitadora que, una vez ratificada por el pueblo de Puerto Rico de la manera que el Congreso disponga, conduzca a nuestra admisión.

 Sin embargo, para que ese escenario se dé, tenemos que aprovechar cada día, cada hora, cada minuto libre que dispongamos para educar, aclarar dudas, motivar a los puertorriqueños que han visto la Estadidad como una opción a largo plazo que lo largo se hizo corto y que el momento es ya, para construir una mayoría contundente, en la primera pregunta de la papeleta a favor del cambio y en contra del status quo, y en la segunda pregunta a favor de la Estadidad.

 Como Adán y Eva, los estadistas tenemos que evadir las tentaciones que como manzana en el paraíso nos ofrecen los líderes pepedés...la tentación de no hacer campaña ideológica hasta tanto se apruebe un proyecto plebiscitario... la tentación de dejar que los líderes pepedés nos motiven a la inacción por lo que diga a deje de decir Obama, o Perry, o Romney, o Christie, o Palin... la tentación de echar a un lado la educación ideológica para enfocarnos exclusivamente en las peleas primaristas... o la tentación de dejar que nuestras funciones oficiales de gobierno monopolicen todo el tiempo libre que deberíamos dedicar a asuntos plebiscitarios.

 Obama expresa una opinión, con la que no necesariamente todos estemos de acuerdo y que otros, como papagallos repiten, sobre un escenario específico en que una opción plebiscitaria gane por apenas el 50%. Elevemos ese resultado lo más alto por encima del 50% (como logró Pierluisi crear una supermayoría en la Cámara a favor del HR2499) con nuestro esfuerzo unido de campaña plebiscitaria y haremos innecesario experimentar si tenía o no razón el Presidente.

 Me recuerda Phillip Arroyo, mi experto en asuntos congresionales y federales en la oficina y presidente del capítulo boricua de Young Democrats of America que, al considerarse el proyecto Pierluisi en la Comisión de Recursos, el congresista republicano Jason Chaffetz propuso una enmienda para requerir más del 50% más uno de mayoría para que una opción prevaleciera y fue derrotada ampliamente en comisión.

lunes, 12 de septiembre de 2011

Postal Convention Welcoming Remarks


NAPUS Welcoming Remarks
by Kenneth D. McClintock
San Juan, Puerto Rico
August 12, 2011

On behalf of Governor Luis Fortuño, I am honored to welcome you to Puerto Rico. ¡Bienvenidos a las Islas del Encanto!  Welcome to the islands of enchantment!

Even though he cannot be here this morning, since he’s devoting all of this week to visits and meetings in eastern Puerto Rico, Governor Fortuño wanted to express to you his appreciation for choosing our Islands to hold this important gathering of postmasters.

I would like give special thanks to Robert Rapoza, NAPUS’ National President, as well as its Executive Board, for allowing us the opportunity to welcome you and, most importantly, to be your hosts.

Leaving all pretense of modesty aside, NAPUS could not have chosen a better place to hold its National Convention.

…and I am not referring necessarily to the fact that Puerto Rico is a beautiful tropical island destination —which I am sure that those of you coming from more temperate latitudes are particularly enjoying…

…but to Puerto Rico’s political, geographical and cultural attributes. Located at the crossroads of the Americas, and with bilingual and bicultural U.S. citizens, Puerto Rico is not only where the United States and Latin America meet but also where the United States becomes a Caribbean nation.

Puerto Rico has been a territory of the United States since 1898 and, together with the 50 States of the Union and the District of Columbia, comprises the Customs Area of the United States —the only U.S. territory having this attribute.

And yet many are not aware of this crucial asset… Puerto Rico’s potential as a trade hub of the Americas is virtually untapped because Puerto Rico is largely unknown and often misunderstood —incorrectly perceived as a Caribbean nation with a special relationship with the United States of obscure characteristics from a political standpoint having unclear implications in terms of trade and investment.

Not so the U.S. Postal Service… which clearly recognizes and treats Puerto Rico as a part of the United States.

Not surprisingly, the U.S. Postal Service has been to many citizens, regardless of where they are situated across this vast country of ours, the most visible symbol of national unity. I even venture to say that the political union and common market that America is today, would not have been possible without the U.S. Postal Service.

So important the U.S. Postal Service has been to the purpose and objectives of the federal government that until 1970 it was the Post Office Department and the U.S. Postmaster General was a member of the Cabinet.

Despite criticism from competitors and political ideologues who want to put an end to it, the Nation still needs the U.S. Postal Service today as a function of the federal government… and Americans wants to keep it that way.

According to a recent Rasmussen poll, sixty-four percent (64%) rate its performance as good or excellent and just 11% say the Postal Service is doing a poor job. Moreover, seventy-seven percent (77%) think it is at least somewhat likely that there will still be a need for the Postal Service in 10 years. Compare that to the President’s 46% approval rating and to Congress’ dismal 12%!

It is true that the U.S. Postal Service has been facing declining revenues and increasing costs —and so has the federal government— but no one has seriously proposed to do away with the federal government because it has been running a budget deficit every year since 1969, except at the end of President Clinton’s second term.

The administration of Governor Fortuño recognizes the value of the U.S. Postal Service to the residents of Puerto Rico. Our party platform pledges to collaborate with the U.S. Postal Service in the standardization of postal addresses, among other issues.

Not only has the U.S. Postal Service been a part of the history of Puerto Rico, it has also documented the history of our Islands through postage stamps and pictorial cancellations. In 1937 a stamp was dedicated to La Fortaleza, the oldest executive office mansion in the United States… in 1949, to the first gubernatorial election of Puerto Rico… to the 450th anniversary of the founding of San Juan in 1971… and the 500th Anniversary of Columbus' Landing in Puerto Rico in 1993.

Important figures in Puerto Rico’s history such as Major League Baseball Hall of Famer Roberto Clemente, Governor Luis Munoz Marín, musician Tito Puente, and poet Julia De Burgos have graced the postage stamps of the United States.  In a few weeks, you’ll be honoring our most prolific composer, Rafael Hernández.

And just last month I had the honor of witnessing, together with Congressman Pedro Pierluisi, the first day of issue of the flag of Puerto Rico stamp that is a part of our Flags of Our Nation collection.

No jurisdiction of the United States understands better than Puerto Rico the vital role that the U.S. Postal Service plays as an engine of the national economy and as a facilitator of America’s unity.

I wish you success in your meetings as you continue discussing how to meet the tough issues ahead.

Thank you for being here, in the Islands of Enchantment. 

sábado, 13 de agosto de 2011

Response to Puerto Rico's Financial and Economic Crisis

Honorable Kenneth D. McClintock
Secretary of State of Puerto Rico
Remarks at the
The America’s Minority Leadership Global Summit 2011

The Government of Puerto Rico’s Response
to the Financial and Economic Crisis

Key Largo, Florida

August 13, 2011

First, I would like to thank Doug Mayorga, Founder and National Director of The Minority Chamber of Commerce, for having invited me to appear before you today. I am honored by the invitation and quite pleased to have come across friends in government and business some of whom date back from the time that, as a legislator, I had roles to play in the Council of State Governments (CSG) and the Parliamentary Conference of the Americas (COPA).

Congratulations are also in order to Doug —who, by the way, grew-up in Puerto Rico. He has done a great job in developing the Chamber into an influential business and professional organization not only across the United States but also in Latin America focusing on the importance of multicultural markets.

¿Didn’t you know that Doug grew-up in Puerto Rico? Then you might be also surprised to learn that the Florida Keys were discovered by a Puerto Rican… I am speaking, of course, of Juan Ponce De León who, while being Governor of Puerto Rico, set out from the Island on an expedition in search for the Fountain of Youth.

To those of you who are looking at me in disbelief, you are right… Ponce De León was born in Spain, just as I was born in London. But… should place of birth disqualify Ponce De León or McClintock as a Puerto Rican? Of course not! He was, after all, the first Governor of Puerto Rico as I am its 22nd Secretary of State…

Not convinced? Think of California… Of the 38 governors of California, 29 were born in other states and two were born in Europe… Who would say that Arnold Schwarzenegger is not a “real citizen” of “Cahl-ifoh-nia”?


There you have it… a historical tidbit that you may not have known about the Florida Keys.

Now, seriously, let me share with you the perspective of Puerto Rico on meeting the challenges presented by a global financial crisis and a worldwide economic recession.

These are difficult times to do what is needed the most: attract investment and create jobs —and the competition is fierce among state and local governments— but we are confident about what Puerto Rico has to
offer with its unique political, geographical and cultural attributes.

Located at the crossroads of the Americas, and with bilingual and bicultural U.S. citizens, Puerto Rico is not only where the United States and Latin America meet but also where the United States becomes a Caribbean nation.

Puerto Rico has been a territory of the United States since 1898 and, together with the 50 States of the Union and the District of Columbia, comprises the Customs Area of the United States —the only U.S. territory having this attribute.

I see a large representation of Colombian entrepreneurs at the Summit and before you ask… Yes, Puerto Rico is a part of the United States and investing or doing business in the Island may qualify you for an E-1 Treaty Trader Visa or E-2 Treaty Investor Visa.

Puerto Rico’s participation in the U.S. market —together with our cultural and geographic attributes— position our Islands as an ideal platform to export to Latin America and to capture the growing Hispanic market in the United States.

To reach Hispanic customers in the United States, and Latin American customers in Central and South America, one needs not only to speak Spanish but also to understand how Hispanics and Latin Americans think. Puerto Ricans are not only bilingual but also bicultural. Culturally and linguistically, Puerto Rican bankers, accountants, and other service professionals are completely comfortable doing business virtually anywhere in the Americas: from Anchorage to Antofagasta, putting Puerto Rico in an advantageous position of facilitating access to most markets in the Western Hemisphere.

Because of these attributes, no jurisdiction of the United States is better equipped than Puerto Rico to reach those markets. And we are ready to do business too… because we have managed to accomplish one of the most impressive turnarounds out of the financial crisis with which many states of the Union are just starting to handle.

Let’s take brief look back at the enormous challenges we confronted two years ago.

When Governor-elect Luis Fortuño appointed me to head his Transition Committee, we suspected we would inherit a deficit of no less than $800 million and no more than $1.2 billion. By the time we were sworn in on January 2, 2009, we had discovered that the deficit —$3.3 billion— was the largest in the Nation —far bigger proportionately than California’s. We were spending $1.45 for every dollar of revenue. As you know, there is not one business that can operate with such a deficit.

Furthermore, in January 2009, Puerto Rico had more public sector employees than any other state except for California and New York —a bloated bureaucracy that our taxpayers simply could not afford.

Even before being sworn-in, the Governor had to meet with Wall Street credit agencies to plead for some breathing space before they downgraded us into becoming the first state government in the United States to hit junk-bond status —a hole from which it would take us well over a decade to emerge. Within two days after being sworn in, Governor Fortuño began making rather painful but necessary decisions that other state governments, the Federal governments and foreign countries have later taken.

We have cut spending by $2 billion and to do that we were forced to lay off 12,656 employees —nearly 7% of our workforce.

During the past two years, we have brought down that 45% deficit to a more manageable 11%, on our way to achieve a balanced budget by next year.

However, recognizing the fiscal and economic crisis are not solved with spending cuts alone, Governor Fortuño began turning Puerto Rico in a much more attractive business location.

We have enacted the most effective Public Private Partnership Law in the Nation, if not the world. Learning from the mistakes of others, we have created a specialized Public Private Partnership Authority. We have partnered with our Legislature from day one, with two of the Authority’s board members representing that branch of government, and thus avoided the final legislative ratification process that has killed so many P3 alternatives, such as the Pennsylvania Turnpike concession. We have five ongoing P3 initiatives: a 100-school building and modernization program, water system customer service improvements, private operation of our tollway highway system, electric generating plant conversion, and the private operation and development of the Caribbean’s largest airport.

We have streamlined our red-tape laden permitting process, which now boils down to one single comprehensive permit from one single agency.

We have enacted several energy incentives laws, promoting green jobs, a new mega casino law, as well as many other pro-business initiatives.

As everywhere, our real estate market was stagnant and property values decreased —although nowhere near as South Florida’s but a decrease nonetheless. To spur housing sales in September 2010 Governor Fortuño put in place an unprecedented incentives program that has helped to reduce our unsold real estate inventory. So if you want a nice beachside Caribbean property in the U.S. at a good price, with subsidized closing costs, reduced or no property taxes for 5 years, and no capital gains you still have until October 31st to take advantage of our incentives. There's an extensive write-up on this program in today's Wall Street Journal.

Recently, Governor Fortuño enacted the biggest, most comprehensive, fairest, and most beneficial tax reform in the history of Puerto Rico which is already leaving more than $1.2 billion dollars in the taxpayer’s pockets. It includes a 7 to 15% tax cut retroactive to January 1, 2010, and future tax cuts totaling 50% for individuals and 30% for businesses in the next 5 years.

I believe I mentioned that Governor-elect Fortuño asked Wall Street for some breathing space so he could try saving Puerto Rico from falling into the abyss of junk bond status. Well… he did it!

When Governor Fortuño took office Puerto Rico’s Moody’s rating for Puerto Rico’s credit was Baa3, or one notch above junk bond status. In June 2010 Moody’s recalibrated the rating of Puerto Rico general obligation bonds by three notches to A3 —the highest level the Island had achieved in more than 35 years. The three-notch hike was also the highest improvement Moody’s gave to any of the 34 states whose ratings it upgraded, with California being the only other state to enjoy a three-notch improvement.

On December 2010, Standard and Poor’s changed its outlook on Puerto Rico’s credit to “positive” —the first time to do so in over a quarter century, since 1983. And also on December 2010 Moody’s reported that in October 2010 Puerto Rico had its best economic month in 4 years.

We have certainly rescued Puerto Rico’s credit. Through this accomplishment we have not only saved our taxpayers millions of dollars, but we have also saved the jobs and protected the homes, IRA accounts, and savings of tens of thousands of citizens the value of which would have plummeted if Puerto Rico had gone bankrupt.


In fact, I am pleased to say that in matters of managing well the taxpayer’s money, we are ahead of 31 States. At the beginning of our administration, the $3.3 billion deficit that we inherited was the worse among the 50 States and Puerto Rico. Today, we rank 20th. Thirty-one states now have deficits that are worse than ours. And for the fiscal year that began a month ago, we will rank 15th among all the states and Puerto Rico.

Why is it important that governments manage well their budgets? First, because governments should respect the taxpayer. And second, because it allows governments to do more of the things it should do such as hire special education teachers, pay overtime to police officers, provide help to single-mothers, repair highways, and so on…

As you will remember, during the first two years, due to the enormous deficit we inherited, we had to cut back government expenses. But for the fiscal year that begins next July 1st things are already doing better. Although we still have a deficit, we have slightly more resources in order to provide citizens with more and better basic services —particularly in the areas of public safety, health and education, which have the highest priority.

How is this possible? Why do we have this year a little more resources than last year? Well, it is simple. The economy is improving. We have been seeing it in all the economic indicators.
The Government Development Bank’s (GDB) Index of Economic Activity (IEA) had the second consecutive monthly increase since October 2010.

Between May 6, 2011 and June 6, 2011, a total of 1,477 new corporations were organized which means a 33% increase when compared with the same time period in 2010. As of yesterday, those numbers had doubled to over 2,900 new corporations.

Retail sales increased by nearly 2% and auto sales increased by over 17% from last year, which indicate that consumer confidence has improved.

As The Wall Street Journal reports this morning, from September 2010 to April 2010 sales of new residential properties increased by 75% and sales of existing properties increased by over 12%.

Exports increased by 14.8% and imports by 3.3% from last year which suggests an improvement in the manufacturing sector.

In April 2011 the unemployment rate showed an interannual decrease of 0.7% bringing it down to 16.2%.

From August 2010 to April 2011 non-agricultural employment increased by 9,000 jobs —the first employment increase since 2006 when the recession began.

In May 2011 we observed an interannual reduction of 14% in bankruptcy filings —the second consecutive month with a reduction.

From January to May 2011 hotel occupation increased by 3.83% to 77.08% when compared to the same period last year.

In 2010 the volume of air passengers increased 4% and the volume of homeport cruise passengers increased over 21% to 545,000 —the highest level in five years.

…and these are only some of the economic indicators.

In fact, the Planning Board’s official projections indicate that this fiscal year our economy will grow for the first time in five years, since our government was shut down in 2006, long before Minnessota.

As a result, Treasury collections will be higher. Although we have lowered taxes to leave more money in tax payers’ pockets, the General Fund net revenue projection for this fiscal year is 6.4% higher than the previous fiscal year.

Part of that revenue increase is due to a temporary excise tax on offshore companies, which now enables them to contribute a little more to our economic recovery, without affecting their operations or the jobs they create in Puerto Rico, as confirmed by a ruling recently issued by federal Department of Treasury.

We will also see a 20% increase in sales and use tax (SUT) and excise tax revenues related to commercial activity. Why? Precisely because the economy is improving… the consumer is already feeling more confident about the fact that things are getting better. And now consumers feel that they can buy a new car, purchase home appliances, or make some home repairs.

Despite all of these successes, last Monday we suffered a minor setback… Moody’s downgraded the general obligation rating of Puerto Rico one notch from A3 to Baa1 due to the severely underfunded retirement systems for government employees that we inherited from the two previous administrations —which we are now in the process of reforming. A negative outlook was also given because of the potential impact the financial situation of the government pension systems may have on the general fund and the concern that the needed reforms might be challenging for the Government of Puerto Rico —actually, any government— to undertake.

Because of this recalibration, some have questioned our unwavering commitment to reducing the government deficit, controlling spending, and adhering to conservative revenue estimation practices. But sometimes setbacks put in perspective how far we have advanced. Had we not taken the difficult decisions we took, at the time we took them, Puerto Rico’s credit rating would have now hit junk bond status with disastrous consequences. We are standing at a comfortably safe distance from the abyss that others are facing. Even with this downward adjustment our credit rating by Moody’s is still two levels or categories above what we encountered when our administration came into office.

Has Moody’s recent downward adjustment affected the confidence of investors in Puerto Rico? Absolutely not. As Ricardo Faerman, President of CEO-América mentioned earlier today, last Wednesday the Government Development Bank of Puerto Rico successfully sold more than $1 billion in bonds –$756 million for 21st Century Schools sold in the local market and $304 million of Public Buildings Authority bonds sold in the stateside market. Actually, the sale was oversubscribed by nearly $200 million because the Government Development Bank received requests for purchases of $950 million for the originally scheduled sale of $756 million. This is undoubtedly a vote of confidence.

Puerto Rico’s credit continues to be at the highest level it has been in decades thanks to the actions our administration has taken to straighten our finances and lead our economy towards a sustainable recovery.

I hope that you are already convinced that now is the time to take a look at opportunities in this U.S. miracle within Latin America and the Caribbean which is fast becoming an example on how to turn an economy around.

I could go on, but will conclude my remarks here so that we can have some time for questions and answers.

Thank you very much.

domingo, 24 de julio de 2011

Vía Verde y la Tasa de Inflación

Por Kenneth D. McClintock

Un servicio de noticias de negocios por internet ha reportado que el índice de precios bajó 0.1% entre mayo y junio del 2011, pero que la tasa de inflación interanual de 3.3% se mantiene alta debido al precio de productos derivados del petróleo.

Las tasas de inflación reducen el valor adquisitivo del dólar en Puerto Rico. Con una tasa de 3.3%, Si alguien se gana $1,000 en enero y compra $1,000 en bienes y servicios, para diciembre, con los mismos $1,000 solo puede comprar bienes y servicios que le costaban $967 en enero. Se quedó sin poder adquirir $33 de los bienes y servicios que pudo haber comprado en enero.

Una de las razones es que los aumentos en el precio del petróleo impactan al consumidor puertorriqueño más severamente que a nuestros conciudadanos del norte. Cuando el precio del barril sube, en los estados aumenta el precio de la gasolina pero no aumenta necesariamente el precio de la electricidad.

En Puerto Rico, cuando el precio del barril del petróleo sube, no tan solo sube el precio de la gasolina sino que sube también el precio de la electricidad.

A nivel nacional, solo dos tercios del uno por ciento (0.68%) de la electricidad se genera mediante la quema de petróleo. En Puerto Rico, el 70% de la electricidad que consumimos se genera con la quema de petróleo.

El proyecto Vía Verde propone reducir de 70% a 15% la proporción de electricidad en Puerto Rico que se genera mediante la quema de petróleo, y elevar de 15% a 70% la cantidad de electricidad generada por el uso de gas natural. Además de todos los beneficios que Vía Verde representa en términos de reducir en dos terceras partes la contaminación atmosférica que genera la AEE, reducir la dependencia en los países productores de petróleo, reducir el monto de nuestras facturas mensuales, entre otros, Vía Verde ayudará a reducir la tasa de inflación en Puerto Rico.

Al reducir dramáticamente el petróleo que Puerto Rico consume en generación eléctrica, se reducirá dramáticamente el impacto que las continuas alzas en el precio del barril de petróleo tienen sobre la tasa de inflación y el bolsillo del consumidor boruca.

Más aún, eventualmente, através de Vía Verde, podrán proliferar los vehículos que, en vez de usar gasolina derivada del petróleo, puedan discurrir por nuestras calles y carreteras usando gas natural, a un costo menor, generando menos contaminación atmosférica, y reduciendo aún más nuestra dependencia en el petróleo.

A corto plazo, Vía Verde reduce nuestra factura eléctrica. A mediano y largo plazo, esa iniciativa de la Administración Fortuño nos ayudará a reducir a un mínimo nuestra dependencia en el petróleo, sea para electrificarnos o para transportarnos. Cuando ese día llegue, el precio del barril de petróleo será un factor mínimo en la tasa de inflación y en el Indice de Precios al Consumidor.

lunes, 27 de junio de 2011

Las fechas de las primarias

Por Kenneth D. McClintock Hernández

Desde mediados de la década de los '70, comenzó una lucha lidereada por Franklin Delano López, con la colaboración de un grupo de ciudadanos que incluía al politólogo Juan Manuel García Passalacqua, los doctores Fernando Iturrino y Charlie Lafont, mi madre, la profesora Nívea Hernández de McClintock, y otros, en la que los demócratas estadistas logramos abrir las puertas del Partido Demócrata para que, primero, dejara de ser una colectividad en que a los estadistas se les negaba la entrada, y segundo, obligar al partido nacional a dejar de tratar a Puerto Rico en forma diferente a un estado.

Como resultado de esos logros, el Partido Demócrata Nacional, que solo le reconocía unos 8 delegados al territorio de Puerto Rico, aumentó nuestra delegación a 22 en la convención nacional demócrata de 1976, después a cuarentipico y ya para el 2008 a 59.

Para el año 2012, la delegación demócrata de Puerto Rico podría crecer a tanto como 68-69 delegados si aprovechamos varios incentivos que el partido nacional le ofrece a los diversos estados.

A fin de acortar el calendario de selección de delegados, el Partido Demócrata (DNC) y el Partido Republicano (RNC) acordaron una "ventana" de fechas fuera de la cual, con raras y pre-acordadas excepciones, no se permite la celebración de primarias o caucuses para la selección de delegados.(1) Esa ventana es desde el primer martes de marzo hasta el segundo martes de junio. Las excepciones se limitan a los 4 estados a quienes tradicionalmente se les ha permitido adelantarse a esa ventana, incluyendo solamente a:

a-Iowa, que puede celebrar sus caucuses hasta 29 días antes de la ventana

b-New Hampshire, que puede celebrar sus primarias hasta 21 días antes de la ventana

c-Nevada, que puede celebrar sus caucuses hasta 17 días antes de la ventana, y

d-South Carolina, que puede celebrar sus primarias hasta 7 días antes de la ventana

Para asegurar que ningún estado rompa con esta disciplina, acordada bipartitamente entre el DNC y el RNC, el Partido Demócrata ha instituído una serie de penalidades e incentivos para que nadie viole, como intentaron hacerlo los estados de Florida y Michigan en el 2008, este calendario.

Los estados que se salgan de la ventana de fechas permisibles automáticamente pierden el 50% de sus delegados y el 100% de sus miembros del DNC pierden el derecho al voto como delegados.

A fin de incentivar que los estados se unan regionalmente para celebrar sus caucuses y primarias en la misma fecha, se les provee un incremento de 15% en sus delegados si tres o más estados vecinos se ponen de acuerdo en una misma fecha.

A fin de incentivar que no se adelanten las fechas, los estados que tienen primarias o caucuses entre el 1 de mayo y 10 de junio y no las adelanten tendrán 20% más delegados.

En otras palabras, nuestra delegación demócrata de Puerto Rico puede crecer de 58 a 69 delegados si nos unimos a otros dos territorios para celebrar la selección de delegados en la misma fecha y si no adelantamos la fecha.

Los demócratas estadistas hemos visto nuestra representación crecer en la delegación puertorriqueña de 0 en 1972, y 8 de 22 en 1976 a la mitad de la delegación en convenciones recientes. En el 2008 en particular, aunque los demócratas estadistas pudiéramos haber estado fraccionados entre los anteriores favorecedores de Obama y Hillary para la presidencia, y Rosselló y Fortuño para la candidatura progresista a la gobernación, confeccionamos una delegación demócrata estadista con anteriores Rossellistas como Norma Burgos y Charlie Rodríguez, fortuñistas como Pierluisi y yo, anteriores Clintonistas como Ricky Rosselló y Lucy Arce, y Obamistas como Lornna Soto y Andy Guillemard. Esa ausencia de fraccionamiento, meses después de las primarias locales, semanas después de las primarias presidenciales, sirvió de antesala para la unidad que nos ayudó al triunfo progresista en noviembre del 2008. Siempre hemos buscado que los delegados demócratas estadistas refleje la amplia diversidad de posturas nacionales y locales que encontramos entre los electores puertorriqueños que nos identificamos como estadistas y demócratas.

La Comisión de Gobierno del Senado evaluó una medida, quizás radicada con las mejores intenciones, para adelantar a febrero la selección de delegados en Puerto Rico, y, al darse cuenta la comisión de que no solo violaría las reglas del DNC, nos negaría 11 delegados adicionales para llegar a 69, sino que veríamos nuestra delegación reducida a unos 26 delegados, muy correctamente no le dio paso a la aprobación de la medida.

Al hacerlo, senadores demócratas estadistas como Carmelo Ríos, Lucy Arce, Margarita Nolasco, Lornna Soto, Norma Burgos y Luis Daniel Muñiz evitaron que Puerto Rico viera su futura delegación reducida de 69 a 26 delegados, una reducción de 63%.

Muchos demócratas estadistas, algunos ya fallecidos, dieron mucho de sí en décadas pasadas para que nuestra delegación creciera de 8, a 22, a 43, a 58 y potencialmente a 69 para que, quizás con buenas intenciones, se fuera a borrar 40 años de logros en un instante, logros que se reflejan en la transformación de la plataforma de una que abiertamente apoyaba el llamado Estado Libre Asociado a una plataforma que hoy refleja mucho más las aspiraciones de igualdad y justicia de los estadistas.

La patria no se hace destruyendo, la patria se hace añadiendo, añadiendo oportunidades de lograr la igualdad plena que nos garantizará la Estadidad.


* * * * * * * * * * * *

(1) La regla del DNC reza como sigue:

"No meetings, caucuses, conventions or primaries which constitute the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process (the date of the primary in primary states, and the date of the first tier caucus in caucus states) may be held prior to the first Tuesday in March or after the second Tuesday in June in the calendar year of the national convention. Provided, however, that the Iowa precinct caucuses may be held no earlier than 29 days before the first Tuesday in March; that the New Hampshire primary may be held no earlier than 21 days before the first Tuesday in March; that the Nevada first-tier caucuses may be held no earlier than 17 days before the first Tuesday in March; and that the South Carolina primary may be held no earlier than 7 days before the first Tuesday in March. In no instance may a state which scheduled delegate selection procedures on or between the first Tuesday in March and the second Tuesday in June 1984 move out of compliance with the provisions of this rule."

(2) Los incentivos incluyen:

"C. 1.
For purposes of this paragraph C, the period of time in which the first determining stage of the presidential nomination process takes place during 2012 shall be divided into Stages as follows:
Stage I: The earliest date specified in Rule 11 of the Delegate
Selection Rules through March 31, 2012, inclusive.
Stage II: April 1 through April 30, 2012, inclusive.
Stage III: May 1 through June 10, 2012, inclusive.
2. A percentage of the base delegate votes determined pursuant to paragraphs B and shall be added to the number of base pledged delegates otherwise determined pursuant to those paragraphs, for the purpose of increasing the size of the base pledged delegation, as follows:
a. for any state in which the meeting, caucus, convention or primary which constitutes the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process in that state occurs in 2012 on a date in Stage II, the percentage shall be 10 percent; and in which the meeting, caucus, convention or primary
which constitutes the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process in that state occurs in 2012 on a date in Stage III, the percentage shall be 20 percent.
b. for any state in which the meeting, caucus, convention or primary which constitutes the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process in that state is held in a regional cluster, that percentage shall be an additional 15 percent added onto the base delegate vote without accounting for any adjustments made pursuant to Article I.C.2.a. States deemed to qualify as a regional cluster shall have contests that are:

i. held in conjunction with at least two other neighboring states holding similar contests; and

ii. on or after the third Tuesday in March."

domingo, 26 de junio de 2011

Perdidos en el espacio



Por Kenneth McClintock Hernández

En el primer día en que está "casada" la competencia por la gobernación en el 2012, los líderes del Partido Popular están "perdidos en el espacio".

Ante las llamadas insistentes de la prensa para una reacción del candidato pepedé, Alejandro García Padilla, después de mucho insistir de la prensa, y mucho esconderse del PPD, anunciaron que en algún momento de la tarde el Secretario General del PPD emitirá un comunicado de prensa. De AGP, ni un pelo y de su Secretario, solo un comunicado!

AGP debe estar reunido, preguntándole a sus manejadores: "¿Qué digo, qué hago?"

Los pepedés perdidos en el espacio tienen razón para preocuparse. Primero, el PNP llevó al lanzamiento de su candidato Luis Fortuño, no el doble de lo que llevaron los pepedés al lanzamiento de AGP, no el triple ni cuatro veces, sino más como 10 ó 12 veces la asistencia, un contraste apabullante. Cierto es que los progresistas tenemos control del gobierno, pero los pepedés cuentan con 38 maquinarias municipales, incluyendo Carolina, Caguas, Mayagüez y Humacao, suficiente como para movilizar más de los 1,500 míseros asistentes que presenciaron el lanzamiento de la candidatura de AGP.

Después del palo publicitario que anotaron con el medianoche en Kasalta, el liderato pepedé se agenció una entrevista con el conocido periodista hispano nacional Jorge Ramos que saldría al aire el mismo día del lanzamiento de Fortuño, al parecer para opacar en algo el anuncio de candidatura reeleccionaria del Gobernador. Con lo que no contaban era con que su candidato demostraría estar "perdido en el espacio" en la entrevista a nivel nacional. Tan es así que AGP se convirtió en el primer presidente del PPD en admitir por televisión y a todo color que Puerto Rico, bajo su relación política actual que ellos llaman "estado libre asociado", permanecemos bajo la Cláusula Territorial de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos. En otras palabras, "el ELA es territorial, el ELA es colonial", lo que la mayoría que constituyen los estadistas e independentistas hemos estado reclamando por décadas.

Todo parece indicar que el poco tiempo que habló el Presidente de los Estados Unidos con el ex-Secretario del DACO bajo Acevedo Vilá entre mordisco y mordisco en Kasalta incluyo una lección efectiva de derecho constitucional por parte del ex-profesor de Derecho de Chicago explicándole a AGP porqué el Informe de Casa Blanca del pasado 16 de marzo dice que Puerto Rico sigue sujeto a la Cláusula Territorial y por qué, minutos más tarde, le diría a Cyd Marie Fleming que "Puerto Rico is a territory".

La histórica admisión del actual presidente del PPD, desmintiendo a Muñoz Marín, Sánchez Vilella, Hernández Colón, Hernández Agosto, Muñoz Mendoza, Acevedo, Calderón, Acevedo Vilá y Ferrer, de que Puerto Rico ha estado sujeto a la Cláusula Territorial ininterrumpidamente desde 1898 y que, en efecto, somos un territorio en la terminología doméstica y una colonia en la terminología internacional, no ayudará en nada a las estrategias de un Partido Popular que criticó la postura del informe de la Casa Blanca hace apenas 3 meses atrás y que le huye al plebiscito como el diablo a la Cruz. Pero, después de todo, está perdido en el espacio.

Por otra parte, esa admisión elimina un escollo a la celebración de un proceso plebiscitario: ya los pepedés no podrán seguir argumentando que no sufrimos un problema territorial o colonial. Su propio presidente de turno los desmintió.

Ahora los 3 partidos reconocen que somos territorio o colonia y que ese problema se tienen que resolver. Superada la primera pregunta, sugerida por la Casa Blanca, y aceptada por el PNP y el PIP de si queremos quedarnos como estamos o cambiar a una relación no sujeta a la Cláusula Territorial, las opciones tienen que ser no territoriales y no coloniales: la independencia, la estadidad o el status soberano que describió el PPD en su pasado programa de gobierno que sus 38 alcaldes electos, sus 5 senadores electos, sus 15 representantes electos y sus 7 legisladores no electos pero juramentados juraron defender hace apenas 3 años. Si no aceptan esa consulta, entonces demostrarán que todos los líderes pepedés, no solo AGP, están perdidos en el espacio.

domingo, 29 de mayo de 2011

The vicious circle of tornadoes

By Kenneth D. McClintock

This spring, a record number of tornadoes has killed a record number of victims, not only in the traditional tornado-alley of the midwest, but in the south and eastern seaboard of the United States, as well. As always, the President shows up to view the damage and hug a few victims and FEMA provides not only immediate assistance but billions of dollars to reconstruct that which has been lost.

In Puerto Rico, FEMA doesn't allow flood victims to reconstruct in floodable, low-lying areas. The federal agency also requires that destroyed wooden homes be rebuilt in concrete. However, those common-sensical rules in Puerto Rico are lost when FEMA alllows wooden homes to be reconstructed in wood back in the tornado-alleys of the nation. As a result, property insurance policy-holders throughout the nation pay for that mistake.

This year's record-high toll---in damages and deaths---should lead FEMA and the Federal government to do away with penny-wise, pound-fooloish building codes and start requiring rebuilding in concrete and steel, rather than wood, unsupported brick, cardboard roof shingles, superficial stucco and cardboard.

While it is more costly initially to build in weather-insulated concrete and steel, in the long-run, lower insurance premium rates and lower FEMA expenditures will save money, and the sturdier construction will save lives.

In Puerto Rico, every meteorological disaster has strengthened Puerto Rico against future disasters, and that strengthening is resulting in lower FEMA expenditures, lower insurance premiums and fewer lives lost in hurricanes and other weather-related events. In Puerto Rico, we don't use wood; we use concrete. In Puerto Rico we don't use unsupported brick, but concrete-reinforced walls that may be decorated with brick. In Puerto Rico, we don't use decorative stucco to hide the fact that there's only wood and cardboard behind; we use concrete plaster to hide reinforced concrete bricks or poured concrete walls. In Puerto Rico, we don't replace wooden roofs every ten or twenty years nor replace cardboard shingles every few years; we build concrete roofs that never require replacing.

The richest nation in the world should start investing as much in structurally-sound construction as its poorest territory invests.

martes, 10 de mayo de 2011

A reconstruir lo destruido por otros

Mensaje del Secretario de Estado de Puerto Rico
Hon. Kenneth McClintock Hernández
Salón de la Fama de la
Agricultura Puertorriqueña
6 de mayo de 2011

Amigas y Amigos…

Agradezco al Gobernador de Puerto Rico, honorable Luis Fortuño, la oportunidad que me ha brindado de, junto a mi amigo, nuestro Secretario de Agricultura Javier Rivera Aquino, representarlo esta noche, en ocasión de inaugurarse el Salón de la Fama de la Agricultura Puertorriqueña.

En la década de los años '40 y '50 el Gobierno de Puerto Rico adoptó una política pública para desarrollar a la industria de la manufactura como principal fuente de empleo, sustituyendo a la industria agrícola azucarera que hasta entonces lo había sido. El cambio abrupto fue devastador en nuestra zona rural, creándose un agudo desempleo y la desestabilización de la estructura económica industrial de una Isla acostumbrada a ser una de las principales fuentes de producción y exportación de azúcar del mundo entero. Entre 1951 a 1968, 17 centrales azucareras cerraron operaciones en Puerto Rico.

El "tiempo muerto" de inactividad laboral que se daba entre zafras, se hizo eterno, y ante la ausencia de una estrategia agrícola con la que enfrentar aquella debacle, el gobierno se inventó una solución dramática y traumática. Decenas de miles de trabajadores de la caña —sin otra destreza que la de la siembra, la zafra y la molienda— fueron empaquetados en masa, emigrados por el gobierno hacia las fincas de tomate y remolachas de los Estados Unidos Continentales, desarraigados de sus familias y comunidades, sin que siquiera se les diera un cursito elemental de Inglés conversacional.

En Puerto Rico padecemos de memoria histórica deficiente. En los últimos dos años se repite al cansancio que las reducciones de personal gubernamental provocados por el menoscabo presupuestario del gobierno, se constituye en el peor momento de crisis laboral de nuestra historia. Los que así lo expresan hábilmente olvidaron sus raíces, de cuando el gobierno creó a la diáspora puertorriqueña en el Norte, .degradando la industria agrícola boricua y exportando a la mano de obra recién desempleada, sin preparación, al continente

Lo trágico de las decisiones de aquel tiempo es que la industrialización de Puerto Rico pudo haberse dado sin el alto precio de abandonar nuestra industria agrícola… de aquello, la agricultura puertorriqueña jamás ha podido recuperarse.

De entonces a hoy, hemos ensayado múltiples estrategias con las que revivirla; reformas agrarias, programas pilotos, métodos experimentales; hmos importado buenas ideas hasta de Israel; tenemos una reserva agrícola en el Valle de Lajas donde apenas se siembra; tuvimos grandes sembradíos de piña pero ahora importamos el jugo o lo elaboramos con materia prima foránea; sembramos camarones en charcas artificiales, las abandonamos, y seguimos consumiendo camarones asiáticos.

Lo único alentador en este panorama, es la experiencia de los últimos años. Los tiempos malos invitan a la reflexión y a la enmienda. En España, como sucedió en Puerto Rico, los trabajadores abandonaron los campos, se mudaron a la ciudad y dejaron el sudor agrícola a los trabajadores inmigrantes. Ahora hay más de cuatro millones de "parados" en España… muchos están regresando a los campos, a reclamar sus antiguos empleos.

La buena noticia es que en Puerto Rico se ha visto surgir una nueva generación de agricultores encabezados por un joven pero conocedor agrónomo, Javier Rivera Aquino, dispuestos a rescatar terrenos fértiles en desuso y ampliar nuestra oferta de productos agrícolas. Lo que ha sucedido en la región sureste es un buen ejemplo del éxito que podemos alcanzar, desarrollando una política pública sensata que dé nueva vida a la agricultura puertorriqueña. La industria cafetalera sigue teniendo problemas serios en su etapa de recogido del grano pero la sapiencia y destreza de los viejos caficultores puertorriqueños ha sido buena herencia para una nueva generación que ha comprobado que, a base de calidad, se compite y se gana dinero.

Nuestra Administración ha tenido las manos llenas enderezando las finanzas del gobierno, superando el déficit presupuestario que amenazó reducirnos a la quiebra colectiva y creando conciencia de que el gobierno no puede seguir gastando más de lo que recibe. Esta agenda de esfuerzo para enderezar a Puerto Rico no excluye sino que, por lo contrario, incluye el fortalecimiento de la agricultura puertorriqueña.

Como adelantó el gobernador Fortuño en su mensaje sobre la situación del Estado recientemente, nuestro joven Secretario de Agricultura tiene el total y absoluto respaldo de su Administración en la implantación de un agresivo programa de fomento agrícola. Parafraseando una conocida sentencia bíblica y anticipando la suspicacia que por la experiencia pasada provoca el anuncio de otra iniciativa agrícola, yo hoy les digo: "Por sus frutos los conoceréis".

Apenas esta mañana, me reuní con una emprea local que quiere ayudar a fincas agrícolas pequeñas a sobrevivir, para lo cual ha completado un proyecto piloto que confirma que se pueden dar un sinnúmero de cosechas hidropónicas que incluyen frutas y vegetales todo el año en torres verticales.

Estas torres hidropónicas de siembras orgánicas pueden ser manufacturadas en fábricas puertorriqueñas, con mano de obra puertorriqueña. Usando energía solar renovable, eliminando el uso costoso del petróleo, le dan uso a agua reciclada.

Nuevas tecnologías como éstas y otras pueden crear un sector agrícola cada vez más competitivo. Esta tecnología fue producto de jóvenes de la Universidad del Turabo, la Universidad de Puerto Rico y la Universidad de Illinois. Esto es otra muestra de cómo podemos cultivar una parte importante del futuro, al exportar maquinaria, tecnología y alimentos a otros, espeialmente al Caribe. Iniciativas como éstas pronto estarán levantando capital privado para expandirse.

Nuestra administración apoya iniciativas,innovadoras y costo-efectivas, no solo por el gran potencial que representa para nuestra agricultura sino porque puede representar la creación de miles de empleos en Puerto Rico.

Finalmente, por todo lo anteriormente dicho, lo que hoy aquí sucede es un acto de justicia. Los agricultores puertorriqueños que hoy son exaltados al Salón de la Fama de la Agricultura Puertorriqueña fueron héroes que enfrentaron la adversidad de la mala política gubernamental, que sobrevivieron al tiempo malo y convirtieron el fracaso en éxito. A ésos primeros doce familias e individuos, agricultores puertorriqueños, que hoy reciben este honor y reconocimiento de sus pares, a nombre del Gobernador y del Pueblo de Puerto Rico, nuestro respeto, nuestro agradecimiento… nuestra admiración.

Muchas gracias.